...and then Magnus Therning said...
% My first post! Jippie!
% So, my question:
% There seems to be quite some different ways to mark that a MIME part
% should be processed by pgp/gpg, multipart/(signed/encrypted),
Well, some of that is based on the PGP method itself. You have to note
whether or not it is signed and/or encrypted *somewhere*...
% application/pgp, and some (e.g. kmail) relies on the body contents to
% find out. Which is the 'correct' way?
That's a very loaded question, and you may find yourself embroiled in a
flamefest for having popped it.
Check the mutt-users archives for PGP/MIME and traditional and outlook to
review some of the past discussions and come up to speed.
% Magnus Therning
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP: 0xD3BC7468)
% The corporation as we know it, which is now 120 years old, is unlikely to
% survive the next 25 years. Legally and financially yes, but not stucturally
% and economically.
% -- Peter Drucker
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
Description: PGP signature