Re: Inconvenient Signature Requirements

2020-05-05 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:12:18PM -0500, Kevin Monceaux wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:36:09AM -0500, Kevin Monceaux wrote: > > > With those pointers and Bing, I found that recent versions of Mutt have an > > example contrib/markdown2html python script in the source tarball that looks > >

Re: Inconvenient Signature Requirements

2020-05-05 Thread Kevin Monceaux
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:36:09AM -0500, Kevin Monceaux wrote: > With those pointers and Bing, I found that recent versions of Mutt have an > example contrib/markdown2html python script in the source tarball that looks > like it should be easily adaptable to do what I need. I'm not a Python

Re: Inconvenient Signature Requirements

2020-05-05 Thread Kevin Monceaux
Jens, On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:47:42PM +0200, Jens John wrote: > Current mutt has a convenient option for this, $send_multipart_alternative: > You should be able to get done what you want by implementing a > $send_multipart_alternative_filter (for the protocol see man muttrc) that >

Re: Inconvenient Signature Requirements

2020-05-05 Thread Jens John
On Mon, 4 May 2020, at 22:54, Kevin Monceaux wrote: > My employer is trying to force me to downgrade to Outlook. One of the > powers that be came up with the brilliant idea of having a standard company > signature, with logo, specific font requirements, etc. Is there any way to > include such a

Re: Inconvenient Signature Requirements

2020-05-04 Thread raf
Kevin Monceaux wrote: > Mutt Fans, > > My employer is trying to force me to downgrade to Outlook. One of the > powers that be came up with the brilliant idea of having a standard company > signature, with logo, specific font requirements, etc. Is there any way to > include such a signature in

Re: Inconvenient Signature Requirements

2020-05-04 Thread Sam Kuper
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:54:09PM -0500, Kevin Monceaux wrote: > My employer is trying to force me to downgrade to Outlook. One of the > powers that be came up with the brilliant idea of having a standard > company signature, with logo, specific font requirements, etc. Is > there any way to