* On 2002.04.19, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyway, if someone with a non-FQDN MID
has a problem with his email setup then
I'd not help him unless he gets one.
same goes for people using pseudo names.
end of story.
The thing is, this isn't the
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-08 19:11]:
* Sven Guckes wrote:
| Message-ID: 20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY
| User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
broken MID and old mutt version.
upgrade and get a FQDN! :-p
I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is
not mandatory, and
»Luke Ross« sagte am 2002-04-08 um 18:57:44 +0100 :
As regards FQDN, if you'll pay for it! It's currently a dodgy NAT'd
Why pay? Get a dyndns account and there you've got your FQDN.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:43:54PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
| Message-ID: 20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY
| User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
broken MID and old mutt version.
upgrade and get a FQDN! :-p
Will upgrade when I get the urge to do my patch cocktail, but it doesn't
apply cleanly so
begin quoting what Luke Ross said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:57:44PM +0100:
As regards FQDN, if you'll pay for it! It's currently a dodgy NAT'd
set-up. The Received headers show this one up ;-)
So's mine, but I still have an FQDN.
Gotta learn to use the tools to your advantage.
--
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:43:54PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
| Message-ID: 20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY
| User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
broken MID and old mutt version.
upgrade and get a FQDN! :-p
I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is not mandatory,
and the Message-ID
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:59:26PM +, Simon White wrote:
02-Apr-02 at 19:48, Luke Ross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
I use mutt patched with vvv-nntp (I know not now - I'm on holiday on a
strange computer), and if the NNTP connection gets closed it asks if you
want to reconnect, and
