Re: Outhouse on Mutt-Users?

2002-04-20 Thread David Champion

* On 2002.04.19, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
*   Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 anyway, if someone with a non-FQDN MID
 has a problem with his email setup then
 I'd not help him unless he gets one.
 same goes for people using pseudo names.
 
 end of story.

The thing is, this isn't the sven-help mailing list. If you don't want
to help, that's fine -- don't say anything.

If you feel that each person is entitled to an explanation of why Sven
won't help him, send it privately.

-- 
 -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago



Re: Outhouse on Mutt-Users?

2002-04-19 Thread Sven Guckes

* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-08 19:11]:
  * Sven Guckes wrote:
   | Message-ID: 20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY
   | User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
   broken MID and old mutt version.
   upgrade and get a FQDN!  :-p
 I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is
 not mandatory, and the Message-ID is not required to
 match your sending mail domain.  (This is recommended,
 not required.) See RFC 2822, section 3.6.4.

*sigh*

anyway, if someone with a non-FQDN MID
has a problem with his email setup then
I'd not help him unless he gets one.
same goes for people using pseudo names.

end of story.

Sven

-- 
Sven Guckes  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outcast/Outage Excess | Doubtlook Distress | Out-of-luck-Express
Outloo  LookOutExpress! Turn off HTML in mails - dammit:
Extras:Optionen:Senden:Nachricht_Senden-Format:Nur-Text



Re: Outhouse on Mutt-Users?

2002-04-10 Thread Alexander Skwar

»Luke Ross« sagte am 2002-04-08 um 18:57:44 +0100 :
 As regards FQDN, if you'll pay for it!  It's currently a dodgy NAT'd

Why pay?  Get a dyndns account and there you've got your FQDN.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:   http://www.iso-top.de  | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
   Uptime: 21 hours 49 minutes



Re: Outhouse on Mutt-Users?

2002-04-08 Thread Luke Ross

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:43:54PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
 
 | Message-ID: 20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY
 | User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
 
 broken MID and old mutt version.
 upgrade and get a FQDN!  :-p

Will upgrade when I get the urge to do my patch cocktail, but it doesn't
apply cleanly so I need some spare time.

As regards FQDN, if you'll pay for it!  It's currently a dodgy NAT'd
set-up.  The Received headers show this one up ;-)

Luke



Re: Outhouse on Mutt-Users?

2002-04-08 Thread Shawn McMahon

begin  quoting what Luke Ross said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:57:44PM +0100:
 
 As regards FQDN, if you'll pay for it!  It's currently a dodgy NAT'd
 set-up.  The Received headers show this one up ;-)

So's mine, but I still have an FQDN.

Gotta learn to use the tools to your advantage.


-- 
Shawn McMahon| Information may want to be free, but fiber
http://www.eiv.com   | optic cable wants to be one million US
AIM: spmcmahonfedex, smcmahoneiv | dollars per mile.



msg26879/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Outhouse on Mutt-Users?

2002-04-08 Thread David Champion

 On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:43:54PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
  
  | Message-ID: 20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY
  | User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
  
  broken MID and old mutt version.
  upgrade and get a FQDN!  :-p

I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is not mandatory,
and the Message-ID is not required to match your sending mail domain.
(This is recommended, not required.) See RFC 2822, section 3.6.4.

-- 
 -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago



Re: Outhouse on Mutt-Users? Was: Re: close IMAP connections

2002-04-03 Thread Luke Ross

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:59:26PM +, Simon White wrote:
 02-Apr-02 at 19:48, Luke Ross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
  I use mutt patched with vvv-nntp (I know not now - I'm on holiday on a
  strange computer), and if the NNTP connection gets closed it asks if you
  want to reconnect, and then continues where it left off - perhaps IMAP can
  be patched to do the same.
 
 Good job you said you were on holiday, with headers like 
 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
 
 that is a travesty :)

I knew someone here would snoop my headers!  I'm back now, so ner!

Luke