Re: Preferred muttrc syntax for set commands

2002-04-10 Thread Michael Tatge
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % * Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote: % Who needs urlview? % % I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea % to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-) Perhaps he should

Re: Preferred muttrc syntax for set commands

2002-04-09 Thread David T-G
Thomas -- ...and then Thomas Baker said... % % Dear all, % % I have found all of the following set commands: % % set nomove % set move=no % unset move Yep. % % Do they all mean the same thing? Are some forms preferred? Yep. Nope. % Do all set commands support such

Re: Preferred muttrc syntax for set commands

2002-04-09 Thread Thomas Baker
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote: % P.S. I'd be using mutt already but the native WIN32 mutt from % http://www.geocities.com/win32mutt just exits on me at the prompt % without doing anything; Cygwin mutt doesn't have URLVIEW; and my So you'd rather be stuck in some other mail program

Re: Preferred muttrc syntax for set commands

2002-04-09 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote: Who needs urlview? I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-) Cheers, Rocco. msg26921/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Preferred muttrc syntax for set commands

2002-04-09 Thread David T-G
Rocco -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, % % * Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote: % Who needs urlview? % % I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea % to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-) Perhaps he should have phrased it as who would