Re: duplicates and x-labels

2013-01-11 Thread Luis Mochan



On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:10:52PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:04:30PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
  ... It seems that after adding an
  X-Label to a message locally, offlineimap doesn't propagate that
  change back to the mail server.
 I meant the imap server.
 

I tried mbsync as an alternative to offlineimap and it seems to solve
my problem: it propagates changes to X-Labels back and forth between
local and remote computers.

Thanks and regards,
Luis


Re: duplicates and x-labels

2013-01-09 Thread Luis Mochan
I tried to solve my problem (below) using offlineimap instead of
imap. But now I have another problem. It seems that after adding an
X-Label to a message locally, offlineimap doesn't propagate that
change back to the mail server. I end up with messages that are
labelled in my laptop but not in my work computer. I guess (haven't
tried) that the reciprocal problem also exist and that messages
labelled in my server wouldn't be labelled in my laptop. Is there a
way to convince offlineimap to synch messages after being 'edited'
through mutt? 

Best regards,
Luis




On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:01:54PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
 I have an occasional but somewhat annoying problem. I made a program
 to edit X-Labels to somewhat emulate the behavior of gmail. When using
 my mail account remotely I use IMAP to access a dovecot server. Everything 
 works
 fine, but occasionally, the network fails and the connection is broken
 before I sync the mailbox. When I open the mailbox again, there are two
 versions of each edited message: the original that had been marked for
 deletion but had not been deleted and had lost the mark, and the same
 message but with the X-Label in place. Currently I order my mailbox by
 threads, and when I find a message that is x-labeled and marked as
 duplicate, I know that I can (manually) delete its predecessor. Is
 there some mutt expression that would  allow me to select all those
 messages automatically? The expression ~= doesn't work, as it
 correspond to the successors, i.e., the messages that have been
 labelled and that I want to keep.
 
 Best regards,
 Luis 
 
 
 -- 
 
   o
 W. Luis Mochán,  | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /(*)
 Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM  | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `/   /\
 Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 |   (*)/\/  \
 Cuernavaca, Morelos, México  | moc...@fis.unam.mx   /\_/\__/
 
 O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org  

-- 

  o
W. Luis Mochán,  | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM  | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `/   /\
Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251 |   (*)/\/  \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México  | moc...@fis.unam.mx   /\_/\__/

O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org 




Re: duplicates and x-labels

2013-01-09 Thread Luis Mochan
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:04:30PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
 ... It seems that after adding an
 X-Label to a message locally, offlineimap doesn't propagate that
 change back to the mail server.
I meant the imap server.