Re: query-feature
Rocco -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % * David T-G [2002-06-03 04:44:10 CEST] wrote: % ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % % I originally meant the '-Q' switch which has the advantage % % Oh, neat! Now I suppose I have a reason to dig into 1.5.1 % already :-) % % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems % that your mails only have In-Reply-To. Um, really? I had no idea... % % If this is indetended, what are the reasons? A tribute to % replying to multiple mails at once? Even tagged reply should include the References: properly. I guess I'll have to look into that. I've done nothing special to this one; let's see how it comes across... % % Cheers, Rocco Thanks HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg28524/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: query-feature
Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % ... % % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems % that your mails only have In-Reply-To. Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references, and then *your* reply to me had only two, and so the Refs have been pruned since then. So when will *you* be bringing back *your* References? ;-) More later; [much past!] time to leave for work. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg28525/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: query-feature
Hi, * David T-G [2002-06-03 13:16:43 CEST] wrote: ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems % that your mails only have In-Reply-To. Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references, Not over here. and then *your* reply to me had only two, and so the Refs have been pruned since then. So when will *you* be bringing back *your* References? ;-) As soon as I know if I can do something about it. This mail is being answered from my daily unfiltered raw backup. And not even there are References. Cheers, Rocco
Re: query-feature
Rocco -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % * David T-G [2002-06-03 13:16:43 CEST] wrote: % ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems % % that your mails only have In-Reply-To. % % Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references, % % Not over here. Ahhh... That's quite interesting, then. I wonder where they went? I checked the copy that came back to me through the list, in fact, since it was just a message or two up in the same folder. So where did your copy of the references go? Hrmmm... % % So when will *you* be bringing back *your* References? ;-) % % As soon as I know if I can do something about it. This mail % is being answered from my daily unfiltered raw backup. And % not even there are References. How odd. Time to check all of your posts and see when you quit getting references, and from whom... % % Cheers, Rocco HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg28530/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
References (was: Re: query-feature)
Hi, * David T-G [2002-06-03 14:01:38 CEST] wrote: ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems % % that your mails only have In-Reply-To. % % Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full % of references, % % Not over here. Ahhh... That's quite interesting, then. I wonder where they went? Vacation? Lunch break? ;-) I checked the copy that came back to me through the list, in fact, since it was just a message or two up in the same folder. So where did your copy of the references go? You mean that yours are complete? If so, this is really weired. All other messages have correct References including yours -- until some a certain point, only the In-Reply-To was available. How odd. Time to check all of your posts and see when you quit getting references, and from whom... You mean, my messages don't have References at your side? If so, then your setup is broken since everything is identical in my fcc box. The References: header of my mails contain (...where I answered yours) only two entries: the parent Message- ID (one of yours) and the Message-ID in the parent's message In-Reply-To: (one of mine). I conclude: we need a referee... ;-) Cheers, Rocco
Re: query-feature (was Re: Problem composing mail since switching to SuSE)
Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % * David T-G [2002-06-02 04:40:58 CEST] wrote: ... % % You mentioned your non-standard config; % where did you get your mutt itself? % % I think I mentioned it before, but the query-feature from % the unstable branch (which didn't seem to make it in 1.4) is % extremely usefull in such a case (since it dumps the real % value mutt would use, either from init.h, Muttrc or % ~/.muttrc). Ah! Since it's been around forever, you must mean something other than :set ?feature to show how feature is set... Does this basically spit out a whole muttrc of settings or some such? % % Cheers, Rocco TIA HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg28513/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: query-feature
Hi, * David T-G [2002-06-02 19:59:21 CEST] wrote: ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % I think I mentioned it before, but the query-feature from % the unstable branch (which didn't seem to make it in 1.4) is % extremely usefull in such a case (since it dumps the real % value mutt would use, either from init.h, Muttrc or % ~/.muttrc). Ah! Since it's been around forever, you must mean something other than :set ?feature to show how feature is set... Does this basically spit out a whole muttrc of settings or some such? I originally meant the '-Q' switch which has the advantage that you don't need to start an interactive session. But I didn't know ':set ?...' before... With every mail from the list I love mutt a bit more... ;-) Cheers, Rocco
