Hi, Jon.
If I recall correctly, when you use the command "new task for template" MLO 
searches through the template to find the earliest start date and replaces 
that date with today, and pushes back all the other dates accordingly. So 
if you are creating a new instance of this structure, and you want the 
first task to start today and finish two weeks from today, you do not have 
to do anything, MLO should handle it. If you want to create a new instance 
today and have the first task start in two weeks, you should put an extra 
"filler" task in the template before the repeating task, with a start date 
two weeks before the start date of the repeating task. Then, when you 
create a new instance from the template, the filler will get today as a 
start date and the repeating task will start two weeks from today.

Does this make sense to you? I'm pretty sure that this is how it works but 
I am not sure I've described it well.
-Dwight

On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:49:39 PM UTC-4, FischerPhoto wrote:
>
> Hi again
> Am I to assume that wen I create a "new task from template" from this 
> template that I will need to change the duration of the parent task to 
> reflect 2 weeks from that time that i am creating that new task? If so, is 
> there anything else I will need to do besides renaming it? 
> I'm also assuming that it can't be made to happen automatically to enter 
> today's date from the time I am creating it , correct? 
>
> Thanks!
> Jon
>
> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:18:06 AM UTC-4, FischerPhoto wrote:
>>
>> Gotcha Dwight. Makes a lot of sense. And again thanks so much for that in 
>> depth step by step instructions on how to solve that problem. And for 
>> taking the time to figure it out.  I'm surprised that I was actually able 
>> to follow it and make it work. Glad that is now available for anyone to use.
>>
>> Best
>> Jon
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:03:28 PM UTC-4, Dwight Arthur wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Jon. Flattering offer but no thanks.  Please go ahead and post 
>>> whatever you want to know on the forum. If I think I have expertise and I 
>>> find it interesting I will answer., when I get around to it. 
>>>
>>> Private phone convo would have a few problems:
>>> I'm less comfortable on the phone
>>> I like to test my answer before publishing it
>>> I want to spend time on this kind of thing when it's convenient for me.
>>> If I figure out something useful I want to document it where everyone 
>>> can see it. 
>>>
>>> If you have not asked Lisa you should.  She knows a lot and might be 
>>> interested. 
>>> -Dwight
>>> -Dwight
>>> Mlo betazoid on Android sgn2
>>>
>>> On Mar 18, 2014, FischerPhoto <jonfisc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dwight, I don't know if you'll get this but do you have any interest in 
>>>> having a phone call with me about this? There are way's that I would love 
>>>> to tweak my whole system to make it work for me. And I think you have the 
>>>> answers and I think I need a bit (understatement) of handholding. Maybe I 
>>>> can pay you for your for your time.  I'd be happy to .. Thoughts?
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>> jonfischerphoto.com
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 2:14:32 PM UTC-5, Dwight Arthur wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, I think I have this. It uses a technique that I call "sliding 
>>>>> schedules." - I use them when I want to be able to do a chore late 
>>>>> without 
>>>>> having to try to catch up afterwards. When one task is late the following 
>>>>> tasks are all automatically pushed back. It looks like the same technique 
>>>>> could be used if you finish a ta sk early, to push up all of the 
>>>>> subsequent 
>>>>> tasks.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a lot of steps because I'm writing this so it could be 
>>>>> followed by people who are at different levels of MLO expertise.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Jon, if I understand correctly, you set up another set of these 
>>>>> tasks whenever you engage with a new client. So I would suggest setting 
>>>>> this up in a hidden branch called "templates" and then using "new from 
>>>>> template" for each new client.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Create a parent task, with subtasks representing all of the tasks 
>>>>> you will need to complete.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. Make sure all of the subtasks have "inherit parent dates" set.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. Give the parent task start and end dates that represent the 
>>>>> duration (time to complete) for each of your tasks.
>>>>>
>>>>> 5. Be sure that "complete tasks in order" is set for the parent.
>>>>>
>>>>> 6. In the task attributes of the parent, click "recurrence:none" to 
>>>>> bring up the task recurrence window
>>>>>
>>>>> 7. Set the recurrence pattern to "daily" and select "regenerate new 
>>>>> task ___ days after each task is completed." Fill in the blank with the 
>>>>> number of days you want to have to complete each step (14 for two weeks)
>>>>>
>>>>> 8. Set Start Date for when you want the first task to start, and Due 
>>>>> Date for the date you want it to be done, in this case two weeks later. 
>>>>> Check lead time to ensure that the interval came out to what you wanted.
>>>>>
>>>>> 9 Leave "End Occurrences" set to "No end date." - if you want this set 
>>>>> of instructions to self destruct after a single use you can select "end 
>>>>> after" but be sure that the number you type in is equal to the total 
>>>>> number 
>>>>> of subtasks.
>>>>>
>>>>> 10. Click the "advanced Options" button to bring up the Task 
>>>>> Recurrence Advanced Options window.
>>>>>
>>>>> 11. If you are going to use this set of instructions just once, select 
>>>>> "disable automatic reset" - if you will use them multiple times select 
>>>>> "Reset all subtasks to uncompleted, if all subtasks are completed."
>>>>>
>>>>> 12. Complete "automatically recur when any subtask is complete."
>>>>>
>>>>> 13. Not necessary but I'd recommend checking the box by "do not create 
>>>>> a completed copy . . ."
>>>>>
>>>>> All done. Click "OK" on any menu or options windows still open. If you 
>>>>> look at the All Tasks view you will see all of the tasks laid out. On any 
>>>>> sort of Active Actions view you will see only the one you are supposed to 
>>>>> be working on right now. If you check completion on the current task, it 
>>>>> will vanish and will be replaced by the next task, which will have a 
>>>>> start 
>>>>> date of today and a due date in two weeks. Depending on the options you 
>>>>> used, when you finish the last task you may have to mark the parent 
>>>>> complete or even delete it, or you might find that the first task has 
>>>>> reappeared as active starting today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Special note: if your subtasks are not all the same duration, make 
>>>>> sure that the duration of the parent is equal to the duration of the 
>>>>> longest subtask. For any task that gets less time, turn off "inherit 
>>>>> parent 
>>>>> dates", set the start date equal to whatever the start date of the parent 
>>>>> is at that moment, and set the due date equal to the start date plus the 
>>>>> desired interval. (If the subtask should take one day, set the due date 
>>>>> for 
>>>>> one day after whatever the start date is) 
>>>>>
>>>>> good luck, tell me if it works.
>>>>> -Dwight
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 12:10:18 AM UTC-5, FischerPhoto wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks so much for the responses mark and dwight! 
>>>>>> Dwight, if "time to complete the task" and "duration of each task" 
>>>>>> are the same thing than yes, each will be equal. I'd actually like to 
>>>>>> change that to 2 weeks rather than 7 days. 
>>>>>> thanks so much!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/7ff0079e-9ee5-4955-8dce-2686587d667f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to