Re: [MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2017-01-10 Thread robisme (Olivier R)
No news about this requested behavior? Olivier Le vendredi 7 février 2014 16:08:48 UTC+1, Dwight a écrit : > > D'accord > We are in agreement > > -Original Message- > From: mylifeo...@googlegroups.com [mailto: > mylifeo...@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of Stéph > Sent: Friday,

[MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2014-02-05 Thread JensFF
I'm also missing this feature since the beginning. I also prefer to inherit prject status like it's done with start/end date. As long as I don't change it for a single task it's always like the top level project. So it's not only suspending a project. If I set a top level project to completed

[MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2014-02-05 Thread Dwight Arthur
I'm okay with much of what's requested here. I even, to my surprise, find that when a project gets suspended, I'm okay with all its subtasks becoming inactive. Just one thing concerns me. Sometimes there are tasks in a project that have to be completed before the date of the project

[MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2014-02-04 Thread kitus
Andrey, would you care to comment on this request please? I don't think what's been requested here poses such a big change on your product, does it? On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 1:26:17 PM UTC+1, kitus wrote: The more I use MLO, the more I think this feature is needed. The silence is

[MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2013-12-31 Thread kitus
The more I use MLO, the more I think this feature is needed. The silence is deafening. On Saturday, November 16, 2013 10:59:52 PM UTC+1, robisme (Olivier R) wrote: I would like the tasks belonging to an inactive project are inactive. And I'd really like to be able to set a date at which a

[MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2013-11-16 Thread robisme (Olivier R)
I would like the tasks belonging to an inactive project are inactive. And I'd really like to be able to set a date at which a project becomes active. Olivier Le lundi 4 novembre 2013 19:53:46 UTC+1, Stéph a écrit : The daily digests from the forum should get people's attentions, kitus.

[MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2013-11-04 Thread Stéph
The daily digests from the forum should get people's attentions, kitus. Task parameter inheritance (either from parent tasks or from projects) is pretty limited at the moment, forcing me to do more manual editing than I'd like, so here's hoping that Andrey will look into adopting more of the

[MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2013-11-01 Thread kitus
Stéph, David, help me get people's attention. If we get enough consensus, the MLO team might consider this feature request. On Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:47:15 AM UTC+1, David Jade wrote: I whole-heatedly agree with the first section: suspended projects should not show up as available

[MLO] Re: MLOBETA-58 FR: customisable behaviour of project status and waterfall propagation if inactive

2013-10-30 Thread David Jade
I whole-heatedly agree with the first section: suspended projects should not show up as available actions in any view (unless you want them too by some MLO settings switch or property of the view). On the desktop I've used advanced filtering for a long while now to make it work like this,