Il Wednesday 09 April 2008 19:40:32 Rob Wultsch ha scritto:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem I have is that importing the same 7 MB sql dump
> > takes 9 seconds if engine=Myisam and 98 when engine is Innodb.
> >
>
> Is autocommit turned off?
>
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem I have is that importing the same 7 MB sql dump
> takes 9 seconds if engine=Myisam and 98 when engine is Innodb.
>
Is autocommit turned off?
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/innodb-tuning.html
" When import
Thank You Richard! Merci beaucoup.
wConti
Richard-175 wrote:
>
> Hi I think you would do this :
>
> SELECT
> sf_conferences.id,
> sf_conferences.name,
> count(*) AS `count`
> FROM
> ((
> LEFT JOIN sf_forums ON sf_conferences.id=sf_forums.conferenceidfk)
> LEFT sf_threads ON sf_forums.id = sf_t
Hi I think you would do this :
SELECT
sf_conferences.id,
sf_conferences.name,
count(*) AS `count`
FROM
((
LEFT JOIN sf_forums ON sf_conferences.id=sf_forums.conferenceidfk)
LEFT sf_threads ON sf_forums.id = sf_threads.forumidfk)
LEFT JOIN sf_messages ON sf_threads.id = sf_messages.threadidfk
GROU
Thanks to Martin and Paul for their answers.
--
Malka Cymbalista
Webmaster, Weizmann Institute of Science
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08-934-3036
>>> On 4/9/2008 at 3:54 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul
DuBois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1:13 PM +0300 4/9/08, Malka Cymbalista wrote:
>>We ha
Hi All,
show engine innodb status gives the following information. I am not able to
draw conclusion.
SEMAPHORES
--
OS WAIT ARRAY INFO: reservation count 97641, signal count 97303
--Thread 1140881760 has waited at log0log.c line 1986 for 0.00 seconds the
semaphore:
S-lock on RW-latch at 0x
At 1:13 PM +0300 4/9/08, Malka Cymbalista wrote:
We have just moved to a new web server where we are running mysql
version: 5.0.45
On the old machine, when we gave the following command:
update table1 set passwd = password('xx') where user_name="xx";
and then gave the following command,
SELECT
PS, the document I send you also mentions:
To change the password but create a short hash, use the OLD_PASSWORD()
function instead:
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, NexusDB, Oracle &
MS SQL Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
ht
>Thanks. So how does one use the password function in MySQL 5?
Most probably just the same, but your MySQL 4 password hashes are
incompatible
with MySQL 5 password hashes.
A search on "password" in the MySQL docs returns quite some stuff, see:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/password-hash
Hi,
I installed Mysql 5.0.45 on Solaris 10 01/08 configured to run
the datadir on a ZFS filesystem on a Raid1 pool.
Both myisam and innodb tables are on the same filesystem.
Innodb is configured to run with a buffer_pool_size=256M,
with doublewrite set to OFF and with file_per_table to Off.
The log
Thanks. So how does one use the password function in MySQL 5?
--
Malka Cymbalista
Webmaster, Weizmann Institute of Science
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08-934-3036
>>> On 4/9/2008 at 2:57 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Martijn Tonies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for the email but that didn
>Thanks for the email but that didn't help. I gave the commands again using
only single quotes and I still get no results.
>On the old machine we were running MySQL 4.0.15a. Is there any difference
with the password function in these 2 versions?
Could be, I remember MySQL 4.1 having a new passwo
Thanks for the email but that didn't help. I gave the commands again using
only single quotes and I still get no results.
On the old machine we were running MySQL 4.0.15a. Is there any difference
with the password function in these 2 versions?
--
Malka Cymbalista
Webmaster, Weizmann Institut
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 13:03:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To confirm that you would like
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> added to the mysql mailing list, please click on
> the following link:
>
>
> http://lists.mysql.com/s/mysql/47fca28b736fbf40/Nicola.Sabbi=poste.
>it
>
> This confirmation serv
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 13:02:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To confirm that you would like
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> added to the mysql mailing list, please click on
> the following link:
>
> http://lists.mysql.com/s/mysql/47fca2617dc97f36/nsabbi=tiscali.it
>
> This confirmation serves two p
>Thanks for the answer but that's not it. It was my typo. I am really
updating and selecting from the same table.
Perhaps "not it" either, but strings should be in single quotes, not double
quotes.
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - development tool for MySQL, and more!
Upscene Productions
htt
Thanks for the answer but that's not it. It was my typo. I am really updating
and selecting from the same table.
--
Malka Cymbalista
Webmaster, Weizmann Institute of Science
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08-934-3036
>>> On 4/9/2008 at 1:54 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Edward Kay"
<[EMAIL PROTECT
> We have just moved to a new web server where we are running mysql
> version: 5.0.45
> On the old machine, when we gave the following command:
> update table1 set passwd = password('xx') where user_name="xx";
Here you're updating 'table1'...
> and then gave the following command,
> SELECT us
We have just moved to a new web server where we are running mysql version:
5.0.45
On the old machine, when we gave the following command:
update table1 set passwd = password('xx') where user_name="xx";
and then gave the following command,
SELECT user_name FROM alon_protein_passwd WHERE (user_na
Is it possible to get the count() for "forums, "threads" and "messages"
extrapolating from the following query? Thanx for helping a newb.
select
sf_conferences.id,
sf_conferences.name
from
((#variables.tableprefix#conferences
left JOIN sf_forums ON sf_conferences.id=sf_forums.conferenceidfk
It depends how public your database is. If you ever need to shut off
one client then you might use separate users. Otherwise it's just
annoying complexity, use a single user.
Remember to use a different 'server-id' for each client!
Ben
Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
Hi,
I am setting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does this sound about right? Anybody see any road hazards? If not, and
> this line of thinking is reasonable, should the DB with the older records
> also be replicated so that when a new old records table needs to be
> created, I don't have to repeat everything on th
22 matches
Mail list logo