Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files?

2010-04-05 Thread Kyong Kim
Also depends on your data access pattern as well. If you can take advantage of clustering my primary key for your selects, then InnoDB could do it for you. My suggestion would be to write some queries based on projected workload, build 2 tables with lots and lots of data, and do some isolated testi

getting 64 bit machine -- need to compile workbench?

2010-04-05 Thread Mitchell Maltenfort
I've already downloaded the 64 bit build of MySQL to have ready for a 64 bit machine I have coming. But the only available download for Workbench binaries is 32 bit. So I have a few questions: (1) will the 32 bit Workbench work with 64 bit MySQL under Windows XP (64 bit)? (2) if I need to compi

Re: Slow Union Statement

2010-04-05 Thread chen jia
Yes, that's the trick. Thank Rudy and Gavin. Best, Jia On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Gavin Towey wrote: > Union does a distinct on all results.  UNION ALL will avoid that. > > Regards, > Gavin Towey > > -Original Message- > From: chen.1...@gmail.com [mailto:chen.1...@gmail.com] On Beha

RE: Slow Union Statement

2010-04-05 Thread Gavin Towey
Union does a distinct on all results. UNION ALL will avoid that. Regards, Gavin Towey -Original Message- From: chen.1...@gmail.com [mailto:chen.1...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of chen jia Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:07 AM To: mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: Slow Union Statement Hi there,

Re: Slow Union Statement

2010-04-05 Thread Rudy Lippan
On 04/05/2010 02:06 PM, chen jia wrote: > Hi there, > > I run simple statement like this: > > create table c > select * from a > union > select * from b; > > where table a has 90,402,534 rows, and table b has 33,358,725 rows. > Both tables have the same three variables. > > It's taken a long ti

Slow Union Statement

2010-04-05 Thread chen jia
Hi there, I run simple statement like this: create table c select * from a union select * from b; where table a has 90,402,534 rows, and table b has 33,358,725 rows. Both tables have the same three variables. It's taken a long time, more than half an hour now. How do I make it faster? Best, Ji

RE: MyISAM better than innodb for large files?

2010-04-05 Thread Jan Steinman
From: Gavin Towey InnoDB should be your default for all tables, unless you have specific requirements that need myisam. One specific example of an appropriate task for myisam is where you need very high insert throughput, and you're not doing any updates/deletes concurrently. A couple o

DELETE CASCADE

2010-04-05 Thread Aveek Misra
I have the following two tables CREATE TABLE `cfg_tags` ( `cluster` varbinary(128) NOT NULL, `tag` varbinary(128) NOT NULL, `user` varchar(40) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`cluster`,`tag`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 CREATE TABLE `cfg_cluster_info` ( `cluster` varbinary(128) NOT