I think that letter actually does MySQL a favour as it points out
'MySQL has been used as a pricing lever by Oracle customers'
That single factor says Oracle should not be allowed to control MySQL as it
would enable Oracle to more easily raise or maintain high prices! For
something to be an
Just wanted to see what people thought about the offer from Nexedi for MySQL
http://www.nexedi.com/NXD-MySQL.Takeover/view
They obviously have more reason to protect and develop MySQL but are they
serious? 1€ for a profitable business unit with a turnover of around $100m.
If that’s what the
I see some of your point Martin but I think the eu would look at that letter
and see the author is stating 'MySQL has been used as a pricing lever'. That
single factor should be enough for them to be very concerned by an acquisition
as removing an effective pricing lever from the market by
I'm fairly sure that the longblob column will prevent MySQL from being able to
use 'in memory temp tables' regardless of whether it is included in the SELECT.
In an ideal world I would move that longblob to a separate table.
How big are the tables fdata,ftype,fgroup? Can you post the results of
Of TianJing
Sent: 15 December 2009 12:43
To: Daisley, John (Burton)
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: mysql server optimization
yes,you are right,the longblob is already move to a separate table
fdna,it is about 10Gb/database the fdata is about 30Gb/database ,the
fgroup is about 10Gb
