On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Byron Albert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a few questions. First I work on a very high traffic site that
> uses vbulletin 1.1 to run its bb. The bb is very high traffic around
> 60-200 concurrent users. We are starting to run into some serious
> locking issues, and I am t
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using 4.0 and switching from MyISAM to InnoDB,
> so quite newbie on this:
I'm still using 3.23.4X (differs depending on which machine I'm on), but
I'm pretty sure that none of the questions have answers that change too
much between those vers
Before I overcommit myself, I want to find out a few things:
1) How much work does it take to add functions (not procedures)?
2) Is anyone already working on these functions?
3) Is anyone else interested in these functions?
The function I need is a unix-timestamp to huma
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Ary Medeiros wrote:
> I'm porting an application to MySQL and I need to support transactions.
> I will appreciate so much if someone could give me some impressions about
> which one is better. BerkeleyDB or InnoDB?
I have to agree with the other poster on this. When I first
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Problem resolved, thank you very much. It was indeed my missing a
concept, description below:
> it was not immediately clear to me what your application
> does. Does one connection update the table and
> another connection do the SELECT?
Yes, as it's t
I've got a part of a complex system that isn't behaving as expected. I've
got one perl program running with autocommit off that creates entries in a
table and commits the changes. At some point, the rows have their state
field changed from 'active' to 'closed', and these changes are then
commit
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Kevin McBrearty wrote:
> I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
> decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
> 3.32.37 on
> Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini table types. Transaction
> handling is v
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > The first two are as expected, the third isn't. However, this is
> > with a mysqld that was configured with --with-innobase. So why is
> > have_innodb=NO?
>
> The name of the option changed in 3.23.37. Use --with-innodb instead.
Never trust printed
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:29:06AM -0700, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to get INNOBASE tables working with MySQL on FreeBSD and
> > I've run into something unusual.
> >
> > Basically,
I'm trying to get INNOBASE tables working with MySQL on FreeBSD and I've
run into something unusual.
Basically, when I create a table with "type = innobase" then do a stat on
the table, it returns a table type of MyISAM. I've verified that this is
what the table really is by looking for the app
10 matches
Mail list logo
