RE: 4.1 performance

2004-07-15 Thread Hickey,Thom
I can no longer reproduce 3.23.58 running faster than 4.1.3-beta. If anything, 4.1 is running faster, especially because of the query cache, which helps in my situation. I'm not sure what (if anything) has changed in my environment. Here's another issue. We are running a Beowulf cluster under

RE: 4.1 performance

2004-07-14 Thread Hickey,Thom
optimize has been run. Regards, Lachlan -Original Message- From: Sergei Golubchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2004 8:11 PM To: Hickey,Thom Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 4.1 performance Hi! On Jul 12, Hickey,Thom wrote: I've been comparing the performance

FW: 4.1 performance

2004-07-14 Thread Hickey,Thom
I was able to rerun my tests using mysqld (as opposed to safe_mysqld). I'm happy to report that the times now almost exactly match MySQL 3.23.58. --Th -Original Message- From: Hickey,Thom Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 9:12 AM To: 'Lachlan Mulcahy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 4.1

4.1 performance

2004-07-12 Thread Hickey,Thom
I've been comparing the performance of 4.1 with the MySQL 3.23.58 that came with our Rocks cluster software. I'm finding that 4.1 is running approximately 1/3 slower (e.g. a 0.075 second query goes to 0.100 seconds) than 3.23.58. Size of buffers, etc. seems to have little effect. The