On Sat, 18 Feb 2017, debt wrote:
How does one "grab" the existing data and then change it? Can this
be done solely in MySQL
I am not sure to understand your question ... you usually manipulate data
inside mysql ... but here it seems to me you are not talking of changing
the d
Y A FACTOR 736.
Now what had taken 38 minutes takes 3.02 sec !!! Great !
--
----
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy) For
more info : http://www.iasf-milan
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Selvam Gce wrote:
Is there any way to get row inserted time or modified time in my mysql
table???
if you define a column with any name and a type of
timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
this will automatically timestamp each record (row
FIRST | 22 |
| 22 |9 | no| 22 |
| 24 | 20 | FIRST | 200004 |
--
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
For more info : http://www.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/personal.html
table later to add them.
if they are big, using proper indices is a must to get quick responses.
--
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
For more info : http://www.iasf-milano.inaf.it
to issue a select into a table, and read back the
output in an IDL structure) but I never managed to do it. But I did not
try hard.
--
--------
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
For more i
same "logical group"
--
--------
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
For more info : http://www.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/personal.html
Do not like Firefox
, REAL*8) get to about 16.
So if a quantity needs high precision (typically this occurs for angular
quantities where arcseconds are important), use double.
--
----
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano
mers complain if one opens a new thread instead of
posting in an existing one.
--
----
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
Fo
or thereabouts.
--
----
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
Citizens entrusted of public functions have the duty to accom
rts from 1.
--
--------
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
Citizens entrusted of public functions have the duty to accomplish them
with discipline and honour
[Art. 54 Constitut
, but sometime affect also
comparison and that's very annoying if you work usually with numbers like
1.43E-12 !
--
--------
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Mil
st no real life application (unless perhaps one is a spy) which
really require this degree of security !
--
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (
bably delete all tables and recreate them.
But I wonder if there is anything intrinsically wrong in the usage of
soft-links, or whether this might be an indication instead of hardware
problems with our machine or disks !
--
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Mil
writing the definition of the union of joins
is slightly painful (but can be automatized).
--
--------
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Ital
out making a physical copy of
the union) i.e. to force proper usage of the various indices present in
the individual tables ?
It shall be noted that the various member tables are all of comparable
length with just a few thousand records each.
--
--
of the members. And I've
noticed that the result of EXPLAIN SELECT (the order) changed according to
the content of the query (e.g. the particular WHERE condition).
So for me experimentally use of SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN is an effective
solution.
--
-----
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Shawn Green wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
> > For each I tested 3 cases (total 16*3=48) :
> >
> > a) the query on the "virtual" table correlated with the external
> > (the virtual is my G left join t1 ..
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
> I'll do some experimenting and report back.
In lack of better ways of doing a tie-break, I've done the following
tests (with the linemode client), checking both the results of a query and
the total time spent. I tested 16 different co
sion)
optimizer_search_depth to a decent default (0 ?) once forever, because
this requires no changes to the code (however if SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN will
require changes concentrated in a few places).
I'll do some experimenting and report back.
--
---
.
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Shawn Green wrote:
> Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
> > I have some queries, involving a largish number of JOIN, which are
> > [...] very slow or [...] remain in the "statistics" status [forever]
> > This involved creating a working table G
&
te that
the bulk of the members are all joined with G), or introducing
parentheses or with other syntax changes ?
- or has it to do with some configuration parameter, maybe related
to what is cached, cache size or other ?
Thanks in ad
ll our logging policy depends on that !
--
--------
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
For more info : http://www.iasf-mil
23 matches
Mail list logo