Re: mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo

2004-08-20 Thread Mike Blazer
ly have too. > > Donny -- ====== Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo (now: glibc patches)

2004-08-20 Thread Mike Blazer
here's the answer I got when I asked a similar question a few > weeks ago. > > HTH, > > --Pete > > Egor Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ...skipped ... -- ====== Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- M

Re: mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo

2004-08-17 Thread Mike Blazer
Mike Blazer wrote: In addition to my previous posting - on this machine I have glibc.2.3.2 which was installed using the Gentoo emerge native installer. Dunno, the mysql manual says a lot about various bugs and patches for glibc (that influence the threads behavior) but it is all up to 2.2.2. Not

mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo

2004-08-17 Thread Mike Blazer
u0 is doing all mysql tasks. Any help is much appreciated. Thanks! -- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: replicate-do-table and related

2002-11-11 Thread Mike Blazer
e-do-table=db.tab but also --replicate-wild-do-table=%.tab and --replicate-wild-do-table=%.% none of these update the slave's tables. Thanks. -- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

replicate-do-table and related

2002-11-10 Thread Mike Blazer
t it's pretty obvious) - it makes quite impossible to change the current base many times - this'd ruin all ini-vars. "Current base" is kinda useless concept here, no? Thanks! -- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -

Re: memory leak

2002-07-23 Thread Mike Blazer
Oops, sorry, few mistakes here Mike Blazer wrote: > > Hello guys, > I'm runing mysql 4.0.0 under apache and mod_perl on solaris 2.28 - we > are in a kinda testing/adjusting period. So, yesterday I've wrote an > utility on top of > `ps -o vsz,rss -e` to monitor the

memory leak

2002-07-23 Thread Mike Blazer
e amount of RAM was growing by ~ 1K per 5 min. Now it is up for about 16 hours: virt: 281928K RAM: 143920K See, something wrong happens, it's back 50% in RAM. It's a memory leak, isn't it? Thanks, any input is much appreciated -- =====