Nowhere in this discussion was this question.
Is it in the plans to have a 128 bit numeric column type for MySQL? If
so, in what kind of time frame? If not, why not?
Character arrays are obviously, but they are probably not the best way
to get optimal performance. Native support for a 128 bit
It looks as though, when I go into my databases, and use the command
SHOW TABLE STATUS, that InnoDB tables do not have some information.
I am on MySQL 4.1.0-alpha-debug. Has this been fixed in later versions?
Example:
mysql show table status;
the information to itself?
- ray
On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 5:24AM, Adam Fortuno wrote:
Actually, MySQL doesn't normally give overrun cut-off information
(best I know). Use MySQL 4.0.x on 10.2.6, and MySQL has always
performed that way.
Regards,
A$
On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 05:37 PM, Ray Kiddy
I am trying to insert data using the C API.
Particulars:
OS: Mac OS X 10.3 (7A179)
MySQL: MySQL 4.1.0-alpha
table type: tried both MyISAM and InnoDB
I have a table:
mysql describe testtable;
++-+---+--+-+-+---+
| Field | Type| Collation
Hello -
I am curious what extensions to mysqlimport people might be interested
in seeing.
I am importing some data with inconsistencies and and I find that
mysqlimport helps one not at all. It seems to me that there are things
it could do.
For example:
-rejected_lines=filename : would put
What does it mean when you say: MySQL 4.0.7 is released and then you
give a URL? When one goes to the URL, one sees text which says the
latest version is 4.0.5.
So, is 4.0.7 released or is it not?
If so, why do you not point to pages on the web site which actually
include the release
I had used MySQL's myisampack utility to pack my tables, which makes
them read-only, but now I want them to be write-able again.
I have used myisamchk --recover --unpack (tried -ru as well) and the
table is still read-only.
What is the actual incantation one must use here? I can backup and
It seems strange to me that the tools in the MySQL distribution that
let you run automatic performance tests rely on DBI and perl.
If I want to test the performance of MySQL, why is it a good idea to do
this while relying on another technology, one that is distributed by
someone else, one
Can someone tell me what the holdup is in getting binaries built for
Mac OS X? I notice on the www.mysql.com web page that the latest
version of the binaries available of the is 4.0.3. Why is this?
If somebody can point to the cause of the logjam, there might be
something I can do about it.
A number of people have asked about this, and some have figured it out
and posted info somewhere, but not in the www.mysql.com docs.
Perhaps, I need to report it on this list for it to get into a distro,
yes?
In configure, there is a bit that starts at line 7514:
*darwin*)
if test
I got MySQL 4.0.2-alpha compiled on Mac OS X 10.2 (final version -
Jaguar6C115).
I am having problems with getting any client to connect to it, so
perhaps I am doing something else wrong, which is possible since I am
new to MySQL
First I tried:
./configure
11 matches
Mail list logo
