the call, too. It would be strange it if were impossible to create an
aggregate stored procedure.
Does anyone know if it's possible to define stored procedures this way?
Rob Wultsch wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Victor Danilchenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oooh
missing? Also, if you think any
of the above settings seem wrong for a server with 1GB of RAM, please
let me know.
--
Victor Danilchenko
Senior Software Engineer, AskOnline.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 617-273-0119
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http
,
and the type of table, and optimise for that...
Ben
Victor Danilchenko wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to optimize our DB server. We have one table which has
1.3M entries, and the keys are GUIDs (so the key space is large).
However, I have it all indexed. The performance was iffy, though, so I
increased
at a loss as to how to do it.
--
Victor Danilchenko
Senior Software Engineer, AskOnline.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 617-273-0119
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Victor Danilchenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GROUP BY seems like an obvious choice; 'GROUP BY username', to be
exact. However, this seems to produce not the last row's values, but ones
from a random row in the group.
Under most databases your query
