Hi!
Ken == Ken Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ken Hi Monty and Sasha,
Ken Just a quick not to say that's such a great idea that Monty even
Ken thought of it before! Monty and I discussed this last September, I
Ken hope we could get something like this in 4.1
Ken Just a vote!
I have
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: Feature idea inspired by bug report
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 04:35 am, Michael Widenius wrote:
Instead of disabling disk based temp tables, we could instead
restrict the
size
Hi!
Sasha == Sasha Pachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sasha On Monday 04 March 2002 02:41 pm, Vladimir V. Kolpakov wrote:
--
P.S. so far, it's helpful bug: I use it as catch
for poor queries!:)
Sasha This actually gives me an idea for a feature. --disable-disk-temp-tables -
Sasha fail
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 04:35 am, Michael Widenius wrote:
Instead of disabling disk based temp tables, we could instead restrict the
size of them which should be equally good. ?(By setting the disk size
to 0 you would be able to disable them, but we should not recommend
this setting).
On Monday 04 March 2002 02:41 pm, Vladimir V. Kolpakov wrote:
--
P.S. so far, it's helpful bug: I use it as catch
for poor queries!:)
This actually gives me an idea for a feature. --disable-disk-temp-tables -
fail all queries that need a disk temp table, and --restrict-disk-temp-tables
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:12:32PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
On Monday 04 March 2002 02:41 pm, Vladimir V. Kolpakov wrote:
--
P.S. so far, it's helpful bug: I use it as catch
for poor queries!:)
This actually gives me an idea for a
feature. --disable-disk-temp-tables - fail all
