Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-02-14 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! (Please continue this thread only on the internals list) > "Ken" == Ken Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ken> Hi Monty and Jeremy, >> We have been a bit reluctant to update the manual, as most of our >> users are still using 3.23 and could easily be confused by this. >> >> I think

Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-02-12 Thread Ken Menzel
Hi Monty and Jeremy, > We have been a bit reluctant to update the manual, as most of our > users are still using 3.23 and could easily be confused by this. > > I think we should wait until 4.0 goes into beta before doing the update. If I may suggest, Could we have two manuals online then? One

Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-02-12 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! > "Ken" == Ken Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ken> Hi Jeremey! >> >> I think so. I just did that recently in my book. Imagine how many >> times I got it backwards and ended up second-guessing myself. :-( Ken> Yes I have that confusion all the time, but it is good to have all Ken

Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-02-12 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! > "Jeremy" == Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeremy> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:27:17PM -0500, Ken Menzel wrote: >> With MySQL 4.0 are we not supposed to be using mysqld_safe? >> Should'nt references in the manual be modified from safe_mysqld to >> mysqld_safe? Jeremy> I th

Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-01-30 Thread Ken Menzel
Hi Jeremey! > > I think so. I just did that recently in my book. Imagine how many > times I got it backwards and ended up second-guessing myself. :-( Yes I have that confusion all the time, but it is good to have all mysql tools begin with my or mysql. Also because the installation of MySQL do