> > PMFJI, but has anyone done any testing to see if persistent
> > connections with MySQL and PHP is actually faster in practice?
>
> Without testing, I suspect that it is faster but that the gains are
> very small. If this was Oracle, it'd be a whole different story. The
> connection
At 10:24 PM 3/4/2002 , you wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:47:42PM -0600, BD wrote:
> >
> > Jeremy,
> >
> > PMFJI, but has anyone done any testing to see if persistent
> > connections with MySQL and PHP is actually faster in practice?
>
>What's PMFJU?
"Pardon me for jumping in"
>Wit
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:47:42PM -0600, BD wrote:
>
> Jeremy,
>
> PMFJI, but has anyone done any testing to see if persistent
> connections with MySQL and PHP is actually faster in practice?
What's PMFJU?
Without testing, I suspect that it is faster but that the gains are
very small.
At 01:13 PM 3/4/2002 , you wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:19:54AM +0100, Takacs Istvan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We use mysql 1.23.47 as a database for our PHP based accounting
> > system. We use mysql_pconnect() to get a connection to the DB.
> > This morning we couldn't log in because mysql se
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:19:54AM +0100, Takacs Istvan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use mysql 1.23.47 as a database for our PHP based accounting
> system. We use mysql_pconnect() to get a connection to the DB.
> This morning we couldn't log in because mysql sent back a 'too many
> open connection!' (or
Hi,
We use mysql 1.23.47 as a database for our
PHP based accounting system.
We use mysql_pconnect() to get a
connection to the DB.
This morning we couldn't log in because
mysql sent back a 'too many open connection!'
(or someting like that) error message.
If I use the command SHOW PROCESSLIST
tha
