Re: MySQL Storage Engine

2010-03-20 Thread Tompkins Neil
Thanks for all the responses and useful information. Cheers Neil On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:35 PM, mos wrote: > At 04:18 AM 3/18/2010, Tompkins Neil wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm currently looking to develop an on line web application - which is >> going >> to be used by around 200+ concurrent users

Re: MySQL Storage Engine

2010-03-18 Thread mos
At 04:18 AM 3/18/2010, Tompkins Neil wrote: Hi I'm currently looking to develop an on line web application - which is going to be used by around 200+ concurrent users at any one time. Can you recommend to me the best/preferred MySQL database engine to use for example MyISAM ? Also, in your exp

Re: MySQL Storage Engine

2010-03-18 Thread Tompkins Neil
Thanks for the useful information. Can you let me know any other things I need to consider ? Regards Neil On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Krishna Chandra Prajapati < prajapat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Many times we need to generate reports (weekly, montly, yearly) from the > data we

Re: MySQL Storage Engine

2010-03-18 Thread Krishna Chandra Prajapati
Hi Neil, Many times we need to generate reports (weekly, montly, yearly) from the data we have. For detailed reports we have to use joins on many tables. So, it takes time from 2 to 5. So these types of activities must be performed on slave server. If you need reports then you should have master

Re: MySQL Storage Engine

2010-03-18 Thread Tompkins Neil
Hi How do you mean "executed on slave" ? Neil On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Krishna Chandra Prajapati < prajapat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Recommend : Innodb storage engine > > Even, i would suggest inner join select query (if report query might takes > few seconds) should be execu

Re: MySQL Storage Engine

2010-03-18 Thread Ian Simpson
Hi Neil, As Krishna said, Innodb is generally always superior to MyISAM unless you need full-text search (and even if you do there are alternatives to MyISAMs full-text search, which I've often found to be lacking in performance). A poorly optimised query will be slow whether it is called from a

Re: MySQL Storage Engine

2010-03-18 Thread Krishna Chandra Prajapati
Hi Neil, Recommend : Innodb storage engine Even, i would suggest inner join select query (if report query might takes few seconds) should be executed on slave. Before doing any thing. Plan out all the requirement. Regards, Krishna On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Tompkins Neil wrote: > Hi >

MySQL Storage Engine

2010-03-18 Thread Tompkins Neil
Hi I'm currently looking to develop an on line web application - which is going to be used by around 200+ concurrent users at any one time. Can you recommend to me the best/preferred MySQL database engine to use for example MyISAM ? Also, in your experiences, do you recommend that SELECT stateme