On Wednesday 20 February 2002 02:06, Anvar Hussain K.M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't feel the the table sizet will be a problem. But how would the
> database function with such a huge number of queries per second.
>
> If I read right, you will be taking a maximum (presently) of 42 channals
> each t
Hello,
I don't feel the the table sizet will be a problem. But how would the
database function with such a huge number of queries per second.
If I read right, you will be taking a maximum (presently) of 42 channals
each taking taking data at the rate of 360/sec. That would be 42x360 =
15120 quer
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 13:29, Michael Mitchell wrote:
> We are considering using MySQL in an application involving recording and
> processing analog signal inputs from various electric powerplant
> instrumentation.
Interesting application!
It is always nice to hear where MySQL is bein
Hello,
We are considering using MySQL in an application involving recording and
processing analog signal inputs from various electric powerplant
instrumentation. Some (but not a majority) of these signals will take and
need to record and discrete measurements at a frequency from 360 to 1000 or
s
