Brian Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have a look here, but use that OS which you know better:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/windows-vs-unix.html
> Same machine, any performance difference?
>
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This e
I can't resist... neither Mac OS X! lol
Dan T
On Aug 12, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Brian Dunning wrote:
Same machine, any performance difference?
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ED]>
To: "Jeremiah Gowdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Brian Dunning"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: Linux vs. Windows?
[snip]
I am willing to bet you I can write a more scalable higher performing
socket
server using NT I/O Com
Folks,
Go with what you know best. If you are a good Windows admin etc go with
windows. If you are a good Linux/Unix admin go with Linux. What little
performance gain from one or the other will be lost if you do not run a
tight ship all around. Performance and stability goes way beyond what
OS
Pat Adams wrote:
> Even though Linux more or less acts like its big UNIX cousins, the nitty
> gritty
> details of system administration, security, and patching are much difference.
Ah, not really. In the *nix world, I first encountered Linux, then HPUX, then
AIX, then
Linux again, then Solaris
Please note that this answer is not meant to support one OS or another,
but the information on that page is not useful. The information is
seriously out of date. The comparison is
on Windows NT not Server 2K3 or XP. The hardware is Pentium Pro 400 or
AMD K6II-350 with old versions of softw
* Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050812 07:32]:
> [snip]
> On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:55 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Same machine, any performance difference?
> > [/snip]
> >
> > Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas.
>
> Except for those areas that it doe
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:30 -0600, Duke, Brian wrote:
> Like crashing, auto-rebooting, memory leaking, program cost, etc...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pat Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 9:21 AM
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
>
Like crashing, auto-rebooting, memory leaking, program cost, etc...
:)
Brian Duke
Level(3) Communication
==-=-=-=-=--==--==¬
-Original Message-
From: Pat Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 9:21 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Linux vs
[snip]
> "creakcreakcreak"
> - the sound of a rusty old can of worms being opened...;)
[/snip]
Except when it's already open.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/12/05, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> I am willing to bet you I can write a more scalable higher performing
> socket
> server using NT I/O Completion Ports than you can write using Linux's
> epoll.
>
> It you're running a 32 cpu system, Windows will consistently outper
[snip]
I am willing to bet you I can write a more scalable higher performing
socket
server using NT I/O Completion Ports than you can write using Linux's
epoll.
It you're running a 32 cpu system, Windows will consistently outperform
Linux in many areas.
My point is, blanket statements like this
[snip]
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:55 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> Same machine, any performance difference?
> [/snip]
>
> Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas.
Except for those areas that it doesn't.
[/snip]
True.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives:
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:55 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> Same machine, any performance difference?
> [/snip]
>
> Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas.
Except for those areas that it doesn't.
--
Pat Adams
Applications Programmer
SYSCO Food Services of Dallas
s
like this aren't wise.
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian Dunning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:55 AM
Subject: RE: Linux vs. Windows?
[snip]
Same machine, any performance difference?
[
Il giorno 12/ago/05, alle ore 16:46, Brian Dunning ha scritto:
Same machine, any performance difference?
go to
http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.mysql.com/information/
benchmark-results/result-mysql-platform-relative.html
anyway the difference isn't only in performance what
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Jay Blanchard wrote:
Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas.
Except Dilbert's boss's approval queue.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Py
[snip]
Same machine, any performance difference?
[/snip]
Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Same machine, any performance difference?
"creakcreakcreak"
- the sound of a rusty old can of worms being opened...;)
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
19 matches
Mail list logo
