Peter Skipworth wrote:
I'd heard that even in general use, some users had a noticeable increase
in disk reads/writes under ReiserFS...it sounds like you haven't
experienced this (?). I'm thinking about moving over to ReiserFS as well,
shortly, and am looking for as much feedback from people
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote:
Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ?
Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of wisdom
that you are willing to share ?
No problems at all. Even power outages and severe crashes did not touch
the MySQL stuff on the
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:22:13PM +, Simon Windsor wrote:
Hi
Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ?
Yes.
Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of
wisdom that you are willing to share ?
It "just works". :-)
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Simon Windsor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 February 2001 16:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ReisserFS
Hi
Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ?
Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of
wisdom that you are
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Aage Bruvoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ReisserFS
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote:
Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ?
Where any problems
Jan-Aage Bruvoll writes:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote:
No problems at all. Even power outages and severe crashes did not touch
the MySQL stuff on the ReiserFS file system, but that's probably all luck.
:-)
Regards, Jan
No, that is not just luck.
ReiserFS is
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
No, that is not just luck.
ReiserFS is a journalling file system.
Sure thing. The luck part was referring to the fact that even the
consistency in the tables was ok, which is more on the luck side, since
all buffers were flushed at the time of
Jan-Aage Bruvoll writes:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
No, that is not just luck.
ReiserFS is a journalling file system.
Sure thing. The luck part was referring to the fact that even the
consistency in the tables was ok, which is more on the luck side, since
RE ReiserFS
What is the hardware (32 bit or 64) and what is the maximum files size
MySql will support on it? Thanks.
Sincerely,
William Mussatto, Senior Systems Engineer
CyberStrategies, Inc
ph. 909-920-9154 ext. 27
-
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, William R. Mussatto wrote:
What is the hardware (32 bit or 64) and what is the maximum files size
MySql will support on it? Thanks.
I'm a mere end user when it comes to ReiserFS... I think you should be
able to find all information you need on http://www.reiserfs.com/
As
I'd heard that even in general use, some users had a noticeable increase
in disk reads/writes under ReiserFS...it sounds like you haven't
experienced this (?). I'm thinking about moving over to ReiserFS as well,
shortly, and am looking for as much feedback from people using it as
possible...
Right,
As far as *MySQL* goes I haven't noticed this in particular. That's because
most mysql reads are indexed and use keys/caches.
As far as general performance goes, I've definitely noticed it.
(Creation/Deletion of large and large number of files is much, MUCH faster
than ext2 - and
12 matches
Mail list logo
