On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:31:02PM +0100, Khaled D Elmeleegy wrote:
>
> I am studying the scalability of MYSQL on SMPs on Linux. I am
> wondering if any one has performed scalability studies. If so, I
> would be interested in a pointer to the results; if not, I am
> curious if there is interest i
> It looks like Igor comitted it to the 4.1 tree on the 2nd of this
month:
I'd assume that this change is necessary but not sufficient for the
MySQL table type table locking issue...
I know, I know, there is InnoDB for that, but there are reasons not to
use it despite this particular wonderful ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:27:38PM -0700, Steven Roussey wrote:
>
>>>MyISAM performance is limited right now by a global lock in the key
>>>cache. However, I believe there is work going on to fix that in the
>>>4.1 tree.
>>
>>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:25:31AM -0700, Steven Roussey wrote:
> > It looks like Igor comitted it to the 4.1 tree on the 2nd of this
> month:
>
> I'd assume that this change is necessary but not sufficient for the
> MySQL table type table locking issue...
What issue is that?
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:27:38PM -0700, Steven Roussey wrote:
> > MyISAM performance is limited right now by a global lock in the key
> > cache. However, I believe there is work going on to fix that in the
> > 4.1 tree.
>
> Really? I thought it was going to be fixed in the 5.1 tree, which will
> MyISAM performance is limited right now by a global lock in the key
> cache. However, I believe there is work going on to fix that in the
> 4.1 tree.
Really? I thought it was going to be fixed in the 5.1 tree, which will
be years away from production quality. 4.1 would be really cool, but it
se
