On Wednesday 20 February 2002 02:06, Anvar Hussain K.M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't feel the the table sizet will be a problem. But how would the
> database function with such a huge number of queries per second.
>
> If I read right, you will be taking a maximum (presently) of 42 channals
> each t
Hello,
I don't feel the the table sizet will be a problem. But how would the
database function with such a huge number of queries per second.
If I read right, you will be taking a maximum (presently) of 42 channals
each taking taking data at the rate of 360/sec. That would be 42x360 =
15120 quer
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 13:29, Michael Mitchell wrote:
> We are considering using MySQL in an application involving recording and
> processing analog signal inputs from various electric powerplant
> instrumentation.
Interesting application!
It is always nice to hear where MySQL is bein
