Hi!
Sorry for delayed answer - I was on vacations...
On Dec 08, Uros Kotnik wrote:
OK, I will give you more details.
Table CDS, have 1,053,794 rows, FT index on title,
Data 67,646 KB, Index 70,401 KB
Table ARTISTS, Rows 292,330, FT on name,
Data 8,096 KB
Index 17,218 KB
Table
Message-
From: Chuck Gadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 21:50
To: Uros Kotnik; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and
full-text searches
Uros Kotnik wrote:
It makes sense, but Sergei G. said :
And are you sure
difference between boolean full-text searches and
full-text searches
Uros Kotnik wrote:
It makes sense, but Sergei G. said :
And are you sure the numbers are correct, the first query - the one
without IN BOOLEAN MODE - is faster ? I would expect the opposite.
I guess that for my DB I can't expect
Message-
From: Sergei Golubchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 00:02
To: Uros Kotnik
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and
full-text searches
Hi!
On Nov 27, Uros Kotnik wrote:
Executing this SQL, takes ~5 sec
Message-
From: Sergei Golubchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 00:02
To: Uros Kotnik
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and
full-text searches
Hi!
On Nov 27, Uros Kotnik wrote:
Executing this SQL, takes ~5 sec
Uros Kotnik wrote:
Time for first SQL : 21 sec.
SELECT artists.name, cds.title, tracks.title FROM artists, cds, tracks
WHERE artists.artistid = cds.artistid AND artists.artistid =
tracks.artistid AND cds.cdid = tracks.cdid AND MATCH (artists.name)
AGAINST ('madonna'IN BOOLEAN MODE) AND
MATCH
Gadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 13:17
To: Uros Kotnik; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and
full-text searches
Uros Kotnik wrote:
Time for first SQL : 21 sec.
SELECT artists.name, cds.title, tracks.title FROM
Uros Kotnik wrote:
It makes sense, but Sergei G. said :
And are you sure the numbers are correct, the first query - the one
without IN BOOLEAN MODE - is faster ? I would expect the opposite.
I guess that for my DB I can't expect satisfied in boolena mode times
?
But also when searching without
Hi!
On Nov 27, Uros Kotnik wrote:
Executing this SQL, takes ~5 sec.
select artists.name, cds.title, tracks.title from artists, tracks, cds
where artists.artistid = tracks.artistid and cds.cdid = tracks.cdid
and MATCH (artists.name) AGAINST ('madonna')
and MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST
Executing this SQL, takes ~5 sec.
select artists.name , cds.title , tracks.title from artists, tracks,
cds
where artists.artistid = tracks.artistid and cds.cdid = tracks.cdid
and MATCH (artists.name) AGAINST ('madonna')
and MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST ('music')
and MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST
10 matches
Mail list logo
