Re: mysqldump format.

2004-05-28 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:05:53PM +0300, Victoria Reznichenko wrote: > > Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In the old days of mysql (version 3.x) the mysqldump command would > > > produce one text line per database row, but since then i

Re: mysqldump format.

2004-05-28 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:05:53PM +0300, Victoria Reznichenko wrote: > Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the old days of mysql (version 3.x) the mysqldump command would > > produce one text line per database row, but since then it appears to > > have been replaced with an "extende

Re: mysqldump format.

2004-05-28 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the old days of mysql (version 3.x) the mysqldump command would > produce one text line per database row, but since then it appears to > have been replaced with an "extended insert" format which is more > efficient for getting data back into the data

mysqldump format.

2004-05-28 Thread Josef Karthauser
In the old days of mysql (version 3.x) the mysqldump command would produce one text line per database row, but since then it appears to have been replaced with an "extended insert" format which is more efficient for getting data back into the database. The old format was good however for running "