[Replication] - urgent

2007-10-02 Thread Ratheesh K J
Hello all, I issued a create table statement on the master for a table which was not present on the master but present on the slave. I did this purposely to see the error on slave. I am a newbie to replication. Now when i see SLave status on the slave machine it shows that the SQL Thread has

Re: [Replication] - urgent

2007-10-02 Thread Jan Kirchhoff
Ratheesh K J schrieb: Hello all, I issued a create table statement on the master for a table which was not present on the master but present on the slave. I did this purposely to see the error on slave. I am a newbie to replication. Now when i see SLave status on the slave machine it shows

RE: DB Schema Comparison Utility ?

2007-10-02 Thread mark addison
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 12:56 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote: This has been asked for many many times on this list, not sure why mySQL AB doesn't just release a command line tool like a 'mysql diff' and also a 'mysql lint'. The lint one should be totally trivial for them to do, as they already have

Full Innodb Table Locks deadlocking with AUTO_INC locks.

2007-10-02 Thread William Newton
Hello List, I discovered an unusual problem with the way Innodb handles the AUTO_INC lock with a full table lock. I was wondering if this is a known issue, or I'm doing something completely wrong. I'm working with MYSQL Server version: 5.0.42-debug-log on Gentoo Linux. So lets say I have

Re: Full Innodb Table Locks deadlocking with AUTO_INC locks.

2007-10-02 Thread Baron Schwartz
Hi William, William Newton wrote: Hello List, I discovered an unusual problem with the way Innodb handles the AUTO_INC lock with a full table lock. I was wondering if this is a known issue, or I'm doing something completely wrong. I'm working with MYSQL Server version: 5.0.42-debug-log on

Re: Full Innodb Table Locks deadlocking with AUTO_INC locks.

2007-10-02 Thread William Newton
Thanks for the quick reply Barron, but doesn't SET AUTOCOMMIT = 0; disable AUTOCOMMIT ? from http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/lock-tables.html : The correct way to use LOCK TABLES and UNLOCK TABLES with transactional tables, such as InnoDB tables, is

Re: Full Innodb Table Locks deadlocking with AUTO_INC locks.

2007-10-02 Thread Baron Schwartz
Yes. Sorry, I wasn't verbose enough. I agree with you. And I also agree that this part of the manual is kind of nonsensical. I have never understood it fully. Part of what I was saying is I wonder whether the manual is wrong and you are getting a deadlock anyway. William Newton wrote:

image_getindb.php?rob=bert

2007-10-02 Thread Rob Wultsch
-- Rob Wultsch (480)223-2566 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (email/google im) wultsch (aim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (msn) -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Multipart + IN comparison on the second part + JOIN does not use full index

2007-10-02 Thread Eamon Daly
Hi, all. I couldn't find this mentioned in the docs or in the archives, so I'd figure I'd ask. I have a table with a multipart index on three columns. When querying the table alone using IN operators on any of the three columns, all parts of the index are used. However, if I do a JOIN with another