Re: Named pipe vs TCP/IP speed

2003-08-23 Thread Jakob Dölling
Hi: This surprised me! I have been connecting with named pipes (and telling others to do the same) on Win2k since I discovered them, because my queries (and time to connect) are most definitely *faster*. The client/server communication is about 25-30% slower using TCP/IP. Example: a simple

Re: Named pipe vs TCP/IP speed

2003-08-23 Thread Matt W
- Original Message - From: Jakob Dölling Hi: This surprised me! I have been connecting with named pipes (and telling others to do the same) on Win2k since I discovered them, because my queries (and time to connect) are most definitely *faster*. The client/server communication is

Named pipe vs TCP/IP speed

2003-08-22 Thread Matt W
Hi all, I just noticed this in the manual yesterday: http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Windows_running.html MySQL supports TCP/IP on all Windows platforms. The mysqld-nt and mysql-max-nt servers support named pipes on NT, 2000, and XP. The default is to use TCP/IP regardless of the platform, because