Jeremy Zawodny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And we've had good but limited experiences so far with 64 bit FreeBSD
5 on amd64 (also a quad w/32GB).
Somewhere in this list I've seen controversial reports about FreeBSD/amd64.
Seems like it's not yet stable and may give unpredictable performance
At 02:04 AM 9/24/2004, Egor Egorov wrote:
Jeremy Zawodny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And we've had good but limited experiences so far with 64 bit FreeBSD
5 on amd64 (also a quad w/32GB).
Somewhere in this list I've seen controversial reports about
FreeBSD/amd64.
Seems like it's not yet
Thank you for valuable feedback!
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
__ ___ ___ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Egor Egorov
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dathan Vance Pattishall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get permission from my bosses to release the benchmarks I will send it =
to the list.
Please! This definitely will be a valuable information for the community.
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
Jeremy Zawodny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times
better than a quad xeon 3.06. The opteron can handle more than 3
gigs of memory which is a 32 bit limitation. Right now in my quad
opteron we have 32 gigs of memory and MySQL is using
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:01:53PM +0300, Egor Egorov wrote:
Jeremy Zawodny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times
better than a quad xeon 3.06. The opteron can handle more than 3
gigs of memory which is a 32 bit limitation. Right now in
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:48:37PM -0700, Miles Keaton wrote:
If my company wants to get the best-performing fastest platform for a
MySQL server, what would it be these days? Opteron? Dual? Quad?
And on a related note...
If a 64-bit CPU, then I'm assuming it would need an operating
, with the rpm built by MySQL. We don't run anything
else any longer.
Donny
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:11 PM
To: Miles Keaton
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 03:05:07PM -0500, Donny Simonton wrote:
I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times
better than a quad xeon 3.06. The opteron can handle more than 3
gigs of memory which is a 32 bit limitation. Right now in my quad
opteron we have 32 gigs of
14, 2004 2:21 PM
To: Donny Simonton
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Miles Keaton'
Subject: Re: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron?
OpenBSD? SuSE?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 03:05:07PM -0500, Donny Simonton wrote:
I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times better
Also, out of curiosity, who was your vendor for the opteron?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:21 PM
To: Donny Simonton
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Miles Keaton'
Subject: Re: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:31:54PM -0700, Brian Abbott wrote:
Do you guys have metrics on this that you would be willing to share? We
are looking at upgrading to the Opteron (from the Xeon) at the moment.
Any information would be very helpful.
I don't have any yet but should in a week or two.
opteron it's less than .25.
Donny
-Original Message-
From: Brian Abbott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Donny Simonton'
Cc: 'Miles Keaton'
Subject: RE: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron?
OpenBSD? SuSE
: Donny Simonton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:15 PM
To: 'Brian Abbott'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Miles Keaton'
Subject: RE: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron?
OpenBSD? SuSE?
MySQL released this a few weeks ago.
http://www.mysql.com/news
If my company wants to get the best-performing fastest platform for a
MySQL server, what would it be these days? Opteron? Dual? Quad?
And on a related note...
If a 64-bit CPU, then I'm assuming it would need an operating system
designed for that 64-bit CPU, to get best performance, right?
I
15 matches
Mail list logo
