Brad Templeton wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:56:36PM -0600, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Doug Larrick wrote:
It sure would be nice if it combined a MPEG2 encoder for the NTSC stuff
along
with the ATSC tuner wouldn't it?
Watch your attributions ... those are not my words, and in fact I
personally
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:56, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Other than cost, is there any reason to choose a PVR250 over a pchdtv
hd3000 since the latter can MPEG2 encode both NTSC and ATSC?
You need to go back and do some more research, as the HD-3000 doesn't
MPEG encode anything. (ATSC is broadcast
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:08:04PM -0500, Preston Crow wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:56, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Other than cost, is there any reason to choose a PVR250 over a pchdtv
hd3000 since the latter can MPEG2 encode both NTSC and ATSC?
You need to go back and do some more
Preston Crow wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:56, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Other than cost, is there any reason to choose a PVR250 over a pchdtv
hd3000 since the latter can MPEG2 encode both NTSC and ATSC?
You need to go back and do some more research, as the HD-3000 doesn't
MPEG encode
Michael J. Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's not what the pcHDTV website says. It specifically states
that the card MPEG2 encoding. See the second line of paragraph 2 of
the following link:
HD-3000 at pcHDTV http://www.pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html
The line I'm referencing is:
The card
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 15:24, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Preston Crow wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:56, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Other than cost, is there any reason to choose a PVR250 over a pchdtv
hd3000 since the latter can MPEG2 encode both NTSC and ATSC?
You need to go back and do some
On Monday 20 December 2004 15:24, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Preston Crow wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:56, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Other than cost, is there any reason to choose a PVR250 over a
pchdtv hd3000 since the latter can MPEG2 encode both NTSC and
ATSC?
You need to go back and do
And besides that, the truth is that the pchdtv.com drivers just
plain suck. People are lucky to get ATSC working.
Fully agreed.
While I'm grateful to have any HDTV in my Myth box at all, I would
generally expect something more polished for $180 a pop. However,
since at this point it's the
Doug Larrick wrote:
Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Preston Crow wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:56, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Other than cost, is there any reason to choose a PVR250 over a pchdtv
hd3000 since the latter can MPEG2 encode both NTSC and ATSC?
You need to go back and do some more
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:24:18 -0600, Michael J. Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Preston Crow wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:56, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Other than cost, is there any reason to choose a PVR250 over a pchdtv
hd3000 since the latter can MPEG2 encode both NTSC and ATSC?
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:56:36PM -0600, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Doug Larrick wrote:
It sure would be nice if it combined a MPEG2 encoder for the NTSC stuff
along
with the ATSC tuner wouldn't it?
Nice, in the sense that any time a card puts two functions on it that
you want it's nice, but
11 matches
Mail list logo
