Hi,
This is my first post here, and would like to express my
thanks for the guys at nagios.org. Nagios is what I've
been looking for.
I have it running (after three days of struggling
with the "cannot stat() the command file..." error)
and have a question on the statuswrl.cgi output.
(But first
Dear Folks,
I am writing to announce that Nagios::Report, a Perl module to munge
data from the Nagios all hosts/services availability report is on CPAN
and NagiosExchange
(where it is called Nagios_Simple_Report).
The class treats the CSV data from the availability report as a flat
file database
One way to acheive this is to process notifications using a script instead
of a long one-liner. The script can contain any sort of logic you desire,
including filtering on $NOTIFICATIONTYPE$ macro.
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/macros.html#notificationtype
# 'notify-by-email' command def
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, dererk wrote:
> New using this great soft, I've read lightly documentation, and It seems
> I've had problems adding more than one service check to a host. For
> Example, check_smtp and check_pop.
> If I declare only one of them on hosts.cfg, It works fine.
As it is intended.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Toto Capuccino wrote:
> I try to check that our Outlook Web Access server is up and running so i
> defined my commands check_http like this:
> # 'check_http' command definition
> define command{
> command_namecheck_http
> command_line$USER1$/check_http
ACKs don't fall with in thos types. They are
handled differently (it's in the docs). We do something similar but not
with the ACKs. We actually tell our ticketing system to ignore ACK
messages because we want the outages (DOWN, CRITICAL) to open the tickets
(with all the info the addition
If I understand the docs correctly, the only notifications that can be set are: u,d,r,f correct? Which one of those does the Acknowledgement Alert emails fall into? I'd like to be able to send just these Ack messages to a trouble ticket system to automatically fill out the ticket based on the use
Please remove me form this DL
Thanks,
Hamid
Advanced Micro Devices
W: 512.602.4704
C: 512.971-5345
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Forough, Hamid
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:02 PM
> To: Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) (US SSA);
nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS D
I need to be removed from this list. How do I need to do that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miner,
Jonathan W (CSC) (US SSA)
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:59 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Nag
Hi all,
We are monitoring NTP for a bunch of windows servers, we have no problems
with win2k machines but with the win 2003, we're getting the following
error:
NTP CRITICAL: No suitable peer server found - Server for ntp probably down
We know the machines have NTP configured properly.
Is there
It turns out that struct timeval is different 8-bytes verses 16-bytes. What if
the value of MAX_PLUGINOUTPUT_LENGTH was calculated at compile time, based on
the overall size of the service_message structure? Of course, I think this
would mean that all of your Nagios machines have to be of the s
>
> I am not sure about it, but I think that recoveries are only send to
> contacts
> who received the alert. So, if you only get the "Critical alerts" on your
> cell phone, you should only get the "Critical -> Ok" recoveries on it, not
> the "Warning -> Ok" recoveries.
>
> Johan
Johan is corre
I've been seeing this (without problem) throughout the 2.0b series on
x86_64.
As of building 2.0rc2 though, I'm getting errors with the same config
that were not present earlier:
Premature end of script headers: cmd.cgi
Haven't tracked down the cause, it's only occuring now when accessin
I have the same issue on Nagios 2.06b FC4 x86_64 although I have not
seen an actualy problem arise from the warning yet that I can tell.
Chris Waters
WAN/LAN Technician
JELD-WEN, Inc.
Network Services Group
===
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
> This works great, thank you. My biggest concern now is when a
> distributed server stops reporting such that a service
> becomes stale, it's going to happen to a couple hundred
> services and send out a correspondingly huge amount of email
> notifications. Any thoughts on how to limit this?
I didn't modify "objects.h", so it must be the compiler padding things
differently for 64-bit.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Marc Powell
Sent: Thu 01/19/2006 02:32 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Subject:RE: [Nagios-users] Nagi
> -Original Message-
> From: Barry, Stephen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu 01/19/2006 01:36 PM
> To: Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) (US SSA)
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Nagios 2.0rc2 on FC4 x86_64
>
> I am also running on FC4 x86_64, I get the same message, I am having
> p
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) (US
SSA)
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:29 AM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Nagios 2.0rc2 on FC4 x86_64
>
> Hi -
>
>
Hi Stephen -
I don't seem to have that particular issue.
-Original Message-
From: Barry, Stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 01/19/2006 01:36 PM
To: Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) (US SSA)
Cc:
Subject:RE: [Nagios-users] Nagios 2.0rc2 on FC4 x86_64
I am also runnin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dererk
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:58 AM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Check more than one service
>
> Hi all!
>
> New using this great so
Hi,
I have compiled the check_snmp plugin from the
nagios-plugins-1.4.2 source code against Net-SNMP 5.2.2.
All of the options I pass to check_snmp don't get passed
along to snmpget, yet they're in the source code. Any
clue what's up? Here's successful use of snmpget and what
gets passed
Hi all!
New using this great soft, I've read lightly documentation, and It seems
I've had problems adding more than one service check to a host. For
Example, check_smtp and check_pop.
If I declare only one of them on hosts.cfg, It works fine.
Declarations on services.cfg are correct, just, I
Works here too. Looks like this needs to be punted to the dev guys
for a bug fix.
-mike
On Jan 19, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Lori Adams wrote:
I haven’t figured out what broke. But I have come up with a fix
for retaining during restarts.
I edited the init script, and added
stop)
+
Hi -
I've noticed an interesting warning when running Nagios on a 64-bit machine:
> Warning: Size of service_message struct (528 bytes) is > POSIX-guaranteed
> atomic write size (512 bytes). Service checks results may get lost or
> mangled!
This appears during the pre-flight checks. Nagios was
Please always CC the nagios-users list.
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 11:30 -0500, Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
> I just tried this
>
> define service{
> use generic-ping
> host_name *,!checkpoint2,!google
> }
>
> and I got an error:
>
> Reading configuration data...
>
> Error:
I haven’t figured out what
broke. But I have come up with a fix for retaining during restarts.
I edited the init script, and added
stop)
+
cp $NagiosStatusFile $NagiosRetentionFile
Now the status.dat file is copied to the
retention file.
-Lori
Fr
I have nagios 1.3 running on OS X Server 10.3.9. I now need
to compile and install the plugins. I downloaded the latest plugins from
sourceforge (version 1.4.2).
When I perform the “make all”, I am getting this
error referencing the check_time plugin:
if gcc
-DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falk
Yeah I had to download the development packages for openssl and recompile it
that way. So it is working correctly now. Thanks
-Cale
-Original Message-
From: Marc Powell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:07 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE
> In order for freshness checks to work in 2.0 and up, you have to set as
> follows.
> check_period 24x7
> passive_checks_enabled 1
> active_checks_enabled0 ; these are all passive checks
> check_freshness 1
> c
Hi,I try to check that our Outlook Web Access server is up and running so i defined my commands check_http like this:# 'check_http' command definitiondefine command{ command_name check_http
command_line $USER1$/check_http -H $HOSTNAME$ -u $ARG1$ }and services this way :c
I am not sure about it, but I think that recoveries are only send to contacts
who received the alert. So, if you only get the "Critical alerts" on your
cell phone, you should only get the "Critical -> Ok" recoveries on it, not
the "Warning -> Ok" recoveries.
Johan
Le Mercredi 18 Janvier 2006
Thanks for the tip... seems like a logical place to look..
Will publish my findings
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Vanhee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:30 AM
To: Chris Goosen
Cc: basile au siris; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-us
34 matches
Mail list logo
