Hello
I have an issue with the avail.cgi and wanted to know if anyone else has
encountered this behaviour .
I ask nagios to produce a report for a service of the last 7 days .
but when i get the report i see in the output a table with entries more
then a week old ,
example :
1-08-2010
On Aug 9, 2010, at 4:17 AM, Assaf Flatto wrote:
but in the summery table :
Service Log Entries:
[ View full log entries ]
Event Start Time Event End Time Event Duration Event/State Type
Event/State Information
28-07-2010 00:00:00 28-07-2010 09:45:29 0d 9h 45m 29s
Marc Powell wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 4:17 AM, Assaf Flatto wrote:
but in the summery table :
Service Log Entries:
[ View full log entries ]
Event Start Time Event End Time Event Duration Event/State Type Event/State Information
28-07-2010 00:00:00 28-07-2010 09:45:29 0d 9h 45m
On 6 August 2010 17:02, Charlie Reddington charlie.redding...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having a bit of a problem with my nagios setup. I'm trying to move
toward passive checks, with failover being a active check. For now, my
failover check command is just a one liner that returns critical
On 8 August 2010 19:47, Stephen H. Dawson serv...@shdawson.com wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is the correct place to ask this question, but starting
here.
We use Nagios for lots of monitoring, and store that data in the RRD
database. We graph that data. Life is good. We have some odd
Yes, we use DRRAW as well. However, running those cal's, and then graphing
within Nagios or DRRAW or pnp4nagios would be nice.
I guess it is an export from RRD, do the calc's, and review outside of
Nagios/DRRAW/pnp4nagios kind of thing?
Thanks,
SHD
-Original Message-
From:
I can't see any problem with the config below. If you have dozens of
checks set up this way and they are all set up in crontab to run at
*/15 then you will get a storm of checks at each 15 minute intervals.
I normally make sure I stagger the checks in cron so that they are
reasonably evenly
On 9 August 2010 16:38, Charlie Reddington charlie.redding...@gmail.com wrote:
I have increased the time offset to be a minute or two. But all our systems
should be close as we use NTP to keep them in sync, and nagios currently
does active checks on this one to make sure things are happy.
On 9 August 2010 16:39, Stephen H. Dawson serv...@shdawson.com wrote:
Yes, we use DRRAW as well. However, running those cal's, and then graphing
within Nagios or DRRAW or pnp4nagios would be nice.
I guess it is an export from RRD, do the calc's, and review outside of
Nagios/DRRAW/pnp4nagios
Thanks,
SHD
-Original Message-
From: avery...@gmail.com [mailto:avery...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Avery
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 12:01 E/T
To: serv...@shdawson.com
Cc: Nagios Users List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Calculations of RRD data
On 9 August 2010 16:39, Stephen H.
Hi all,
I'n planning a nagios deployment at the moment but I am new to Nagios and would
like to confirm that it has the features I require.
I've used Nagios in the past but have never set it up from scratch. I've also
been playing with Lilac over the last couple of days but I think a Nagios
On 9 August 2010 17:49, Shane Killian shane.kill...@irishjobs.ie wrote:
I've read a reasonable amount of documentation and learned a little from
trial and error but if someone could. Point me in the right direction I'd
really appreciate it.
I think that's the thing - the documentation is
I don't use localhost in any host or service configs. There is no use
for localhost, since it is such an ambiguous hostname. In a
distributed setup where there are multiple sources feeding data into a
single server, *every* host name must be unique, otherwise they clobber
each other's data (as
I use nagios on Ubuntu both 10.04 and 8.04. I recommend installing
from source as it is much more stable and works better with the
plugins etc. than the default Ubuntu package.
Other than that since you look to be monitoring lots of windows hosts
i would suggest checking out wmi which was not
On Aug 9, 2010, at 1:24 PM, gregborbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the command arguments passed in a scope?
Such as check_groovy!WARN!CRIT
If so, you could do arg1 and arg2
These would only be available to the check_command, not the notification
command.
--
Marc
15 matches
Mail list logo
