[Nagios-users] send passive result without obsess over service

2012-04-19 Thread Marco Borsani
Hi I need to send few service results from two Nagios servers, but not for all the services configured on the main server. When I sent all the service results I used obsess over service, but now ? How can I do ? Regards Marco Borsani Unix and Monitoring Sysadmin Technical

Re: [Nagios-users] Soft fail alerts in web interface

2012-04-19 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 04/19/2012 09:41 AM, Corcoran Smith wrote: Hi no we don't want to disable notifications entirely, we just want to be able to faster acknowledge SOFT FAILS or disable them entirely? That's not a question, so the question mark at the end is a bit odd. Fact: All of our technical staff

Re: [Nagios-users] send passive result without obsess over service

2012-04-19 Thread Giorgio Zarrelli
Use nrdp or nsca. Ciao, Giorgio Il giorno 19/apr/2012, alle ore 14:44, Marco Borsani m.bors...@it.net ha scritto: Hi I need to send few service results from two Nagios servers, but not for all the services configured on the main server. When I sent all the service results I used

[Nagios-users] R: send passive result without obsess over service

2012-04-19 Thread Marco Borsani
I am already using nsca with obsess over service. I supposed I will be use event_handler option … Any other way to follow ? Marco Da: Giorgio Zarrelli [mailto:zarre...@linux.it] Inviato: giovedì 19 aprile 2012 16:02 A: Nagios Users List Cc: NAGIOS Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] send

Re: [Nagios-users] R: send passive result without obsess over service

2012-04-19 Thread andrew.ford
Would it work to build the send_nsca call directly into your plugin? Alternately, perhaps a wrapper to generically add send_nsca to various commands? Then your command definition could go from $USER1$/myplug args moreargs to $USER1$/my_send_nsca_wrapper $USER1$/myplug args moreargs Andy

Re: [Nagios-users] Soft fail alerts in web interface

2012-04-19 Thread Sean Carley
Hi Corcoran, I agree this is a needed feature. One of my guys was saying it's only the default Nagios gui that prevents this, you can try something like Nagstamon to get a jump on acking SOFT failures. One really should not have to wait until the HARD state pages people to acknowledge a

Re: [Nagios-users] Soft fail alerts in web interface

2012-04-19 Thread Paul Dubuc
I wouldn't argue against this feature. It would be convenient to have, but your argument depends on your definition of a problem. SOFT state errors are an indication of a potential problem, or it may be a transient problem. That's why SOFT states exist so Nagios can retry the test to

Re: [Nagios-users] Soft fail alerts in web interface

2012-04-19 Thread Sean Carley
Being able to ACK before alerts go out (without guessing at downtime) would be convenient for anyone, whether it's one random thing you want to catch before it alerts, or whether you're responding to the first alert of a major outage and want to handle the rest of the services while they are

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios-users Digest, Vol 71, Issue 9

2012-04-19 Thread Stuart Browne
Jeremy, You can have HARD WARNING state as well. SOFT is when you have not yet reached max_check_attempts. Stuart From: Jeremy Page [mailto:jeremy.p...@gilbarco.com] Sent: Friday, 20 April 2012 1:35 AM To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios-users Digest, Vol