ind it useful to watch the *total* memory; in case
you ever have a stick go bad on you, you'll notice.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth &
ped.
IMO, that's the most useful number to measure: most machines will reach
a steadystate where there is 0 or very little (a few tens of megabytes)
of active swap.
If your swap starts to climb, that's when *I* worry...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
on the same box, you can also run it's command-line ticket creation
program, and skip the email entirely.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 21
inks they're still
unhandled problems, even though I've acknowledged them.
Do "acknowledge" and "handle" really not mean the same thing?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 10:36:56AM -0500, Marc Powell wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Barbara Abernathy wrote:
> > UNSUBSCRIBE
>
> Yup, bold blue really helps get that point across... ;)
I dunno; it was white here, just like all mail text is.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
oblems, even though I've acknowledged them.
Do "acknowledge" and "handle" really not mean the same thing?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:25:09AM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > but no sound. Nothing indicative in the frame source...
> >
> > Did I miss something?
>
> Sure I did.
>
> I didn't uncomment the audio file pointers in cgi.cfg, *or* install
> Quick
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:19:41AM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> And why didn't it work for me?
>
> I made the patch, did make cgis and make install-cgis, and reloaded my
> browser tab, then forced a Service Problem (I logged into a machine for
> which "User
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:00:02PM -0500, Marc Powell wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:37:52AM +0900, Ian Masters wrote:
> >> It's a bit of a kludge so I was wondering if anyone else had found a
> >> clean
lert below 50mbit.
If you let the speed of this interface go below 50MB/s; the entire
switch will blow up, automatically.
Cheers,
-- jr ':-)' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
etting up 3.0 about 2 months ago,
and all the config managers I found had not yet been forward-ported to
deal with 3 yet...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
files with the wrong MIME type, and that fixing it
requires patching that code; it's in the archives from a couple months
back.
I too would like to see it fixed; I may go grovel in my Copious Free
Time.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PRO
/gmane.network.nagios.user/55932 is an example
> of why it matters. Threaded mail clients do the same. Your question is
> now forever associated with the original as if it were part of it.
Not for readers on gmail, alas.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
n exec(2) and exec(3)); if the sh-bang line doesn't call a shell,
one is not involved.
But I suppose you may have meant "the interactive shell you're talking
to"...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designe
solate that LAN isn't good enough; I presume you're a) also
doing other stuff and b) smart enough not to tell us what that is. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
have thought its process
model really created such...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
boxes this month, and I
didn't look at the details, but that was one of the stock provided
plugins...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:32:41AM -0300, Fernando Rocha wrote:
>This is Portuguese and we'll translate that for the next release.
I'm looking forward to it. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTEC
me than running a small, much-audited program suid root.
Ok; that's reasonable.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http:
t to delete the
IRT header.
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > Does the CGI not at least scream somehow if there's nothing running
> > behind it?
>
> If nagios dies in such a way that the status_file still exists, no.
> You might consider running
cream somehow if there's nothing running
behind it?
Should I already know this answer?
And, what about Naomi?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 210
7;ve left Jeff's quote in so you can see, Andreas, that you misread
him. He didn't say "SUID root". He said sudo -- he plans to set the
nagios Linux user up so it can sudo to run ping as root.
Seems sensible to me.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
-liner didn't occur to me.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e
this.
I'll assume you mean RHEL 5, not Red Hat Linux 5... :-)
Did they switch syslogs in RHEL5?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associ
FF/Linux), and kill the
process, that's the easiest way to restart it and be prompted to reopen
your tabs.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
A
plement that
pleasant thought.
Now if we could just teach it not to reply to messages where the user
is not the To: addressee...
Cheers,
- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
em only
> serve to simplify.
Oh, I'm all for ticketing systems... as long as they aren't giving
people the impression that work is likely to be done which will not in
fact ever be done. Have you looked at The Original Bugzilla lately? ;-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:38:03PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:14 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > And if other people work the tickets.
>
> I'll volunteer to have my team manage tickets and generate reports.
>
> Its just a reality of
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:49:15PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> "given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" -- Eric S. Raymond
> -- But only if someone writes them down :)
And if other people work the tickets.
Is *that* part figured out yet? :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
me
> tire gauge. Anyone seen this before?"
Can I nominate that for Funniest Mailing List Reply of the month?
:-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RF
mostly 2.x compatible at the
moment, but I gather some of them, at least, are being updated.
As for extending them, I'd recommend looking into nmap and
/etc/services to determine what's available publically to monitor.
If this *is* a homework problem... it's your *homework*, du
wd idea it won't be 100% completed and super-easy to use from day
> one, as there's a lot of work to be done).
The site, I note, still says "after June 3 2008".
Whazup?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMA
installed?
It will show up as broken.
>5. Is it okay to have multiple definitions of the same host with exact same
>text in nagios? If no, what about if just the IP remains same?
I suspect the former won't work but the latter will, but I'm somewhat
of a newbie, as well.
e inquiring about how to instrument an NT4 SP6 PDC for Nagios
next week... :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates
sure that another copy
> of
And if Marc's suggestion doesn't help, note that "I can't create
$PATHNAME" can mean that there's something wrong with *any directory in
that path*, not merely the last one.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
erride None
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
# Order deny,allow
# Deny from all
# Allow from 127.0.0.1
AuthName "Nagios Access"
AuthType Basic
AuthUserFile /appl/nagios/etc/htpasswd.users
Require valid-user
and that works, as the brits say, a treat.
Cheer
s/libexec/
>there isnt too.
Scroll back through the output of ./configure when you do it, and it
will likely tell you something useful...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Th
ot;, warn on "3.1" and
> error on everything else.
That sounds like a neat idea. Could you provide one more layer of
detail on that? Which plugin do you use?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
t; Thanks.
Sorry; my version of mutt doesn't handle large numbers of 'lists'
directives well; this list wasn't being recognized for List reply, and
I hadn't fixed it and was using Group reply instead. Fixed now.
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at
//lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
> -
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Mar
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 08:19:14AM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> >Stupid question of the week:
> >
> >I see that Nagios 3 represents as CRITICAL services on hosts which are
> >down.
>
> Those CRITICAL tests are actually test-results. S
went UNKNOWN if the host
wasn't running?
Ok, I guess I can see both approaches to that as being sensible in some
circumstances; is there a knob to change that behaviour for a service,
or something less obvious than a knob?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
s. Nagios isn't really well suited to that
sort of running performance monitoring/graphing/logging, from what I
can tell.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
roper status to nagios
> and you can select which part of the output will be passed through to
> nagios as text.
>
> If I had a serious need for this I would write a perl script.
And use Net::SNMP, instead of shelling out to a command.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashwort
the same (though I can't see why they
wouldn't...); the MIB items slip out of sync by the end. It's a start
though, and I have a perl guy in house.
Thanks again.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
addition to any meaning they may have to Nagios.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
ok for differences?
>
> Look for an access control list of some kind on the target device which
> restricts who can query it via SNMP.
And, if that's difficult to do, take the working host offnet, and
alias the other one's interface to it's IP.
Cheers
looked at the pretty pictures.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St
calhost system`;
>
> foreach my $i (0..$#names) {
> print "$names[$i] $numbers[$i]\n\n";
> }
See what happens when you're not a perl guy? Thanks a bunch, Andy.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PR
to get the combo.
Splicing didn't look especially easy, which is why I was hoping to get
snmpwalk to do it for me.
Mine is net-snmp 5.4, and yes, it has a billion and six output options,
but none of them seem to do this; I tried several combinations.
Thanks, anyway...
Cheers,
-- j
. :-) with
having to look them up ever 5 minutes.
There doesn't seem to *be* a way to do that, though.
Anyone ever try this, and figure out the magic mojo?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
s it's head most prominently WRT system
management, which intersects directly with setting up Nagios
monitoring.
Good luck, and feel free to report your results (on the wiki?) if you
have success.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTE
> check results. If the process can be scripted, it can be used as a check
> plugin. It's that scripting part that can be challenging...
Naw; just use an RFC1149 interface driver; it'll take care of all that
for you.
http://linux.omnipotent.net/article.php?article_id=12239
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:19:22PM -0500, Marc Powell wrote:
> On May 20, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:16:23PM +0530, Michael Mukherji wrote:
> >> thanks for your input.But the port was actually down.Bt i want
> >> noti
r to either OT the
subject line, or, better, take it off-list.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
______
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
> any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk
ommercl/1coffee/apstserv.html#ICB
> http://www.bunnomatic.com/pages/windows/1_5_TF_Bless_Serv_B_D.html
> http://www.bunnomatic.com/pdfs/commercial/specsheets/a35.pdf
>
> Now, if you get that to work, you should post a how-to.
And you *gotta* implement RFC 2325. :-)
Cheers
oblem is really
NP-hard to solve generally.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:15:52PM -0500, tblader wrote:
> Mirza Dedic wrote:
>
> > anyone know of a product you can attach to it that has network
> > capabilities that Nagios can talk to? Lol
>
> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Coffee.html
And let's not forget RFCs 2324 and 2
ive when people pick up
the pot to pour coffee.
Urns work better in this environment.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates
o it" to
be a red trap, and for managers to be able to send the green trap
manually.
I think this is a failing in the design of c_l, or at least it not
being designed for what you want -- which seems a reasonable thing to
want -- but you could also view it as Nagios being iffy on handling
ctory
`/appl/downloads/nagios-plugins-1.4.11/plugins'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/appl/downloads/nagios-plugins-1.4.11'
make: *** [all] Error 2
This appears to be a common build error, but no one ever answers when
prople ask, that Google wan
roups hostgroup1,hostgroup2,hostgroup4,hostgroupn
> }
It doesn't cause any confusion, statistical or otherwise, to put a host
in more than one group, does it?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
f other host groups whose members
> should be included in this group.
I did see that, when I actually looked far enough. :-)
For what it's worth, it doesn't *actually* say that if you are going to
declare an object a member of a hostgroup, you *do* still actually have
to *define* it
o define
the hostgroup in some amorphous 'somewhere', and then add all the hosts
to it *there* (which means that there are two places you have to change
when you add a new host, which I'm not fond of).
Have any of the DBMS config builder front-ends been updated to 3.0 yet?
Cheer
that disk isn't remote.
This isn't entirely the best documented process -- I know, cause it
took me almost 3 hours to figure it out. :-)
===
You know what would be *wonderful*?
If someone could post, somewhere, one or more working complete
configurations, annotated
load average *per processor*, and then have one
check_load per processor.
Alternatively, you could get those numbers that top(1) displays for
utilization percentages, and massage *those* to get your load results
per proc; those are split. But you'd need to average them.
Cheers,
t, they
> would be alerted.
I think the way you should set this up is to send the Nagios alerts as
Level 1 messages, and then your users can set up their notification
alerts anyway that suits them.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMA
a really good question, though, and opinions will likely differ.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.p
check_nrpe!check_load
> }
And to expand that a touch so it's clearer for the archives, if you use
NRPE, *you must define the check commands on both machines*, the
monitoring machine, and the target monitored machine.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Bayli
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> If your particular carrier *and phone* happen to tolerate that, then
> you go with that.
>
> But understand the other repliant's warning: it's out-of-standard.
Excuse me: you're using Gnokii.
*B
> }
>
> With this command I can send SMS with more than 160 symbols but less than
> 220 and it's suitable for my needs.
If your particular carrier *and phone* happen to tolerate that, then
you go with that.
But understand the other repliant's warning: it&#
n't* say sticky; the last
sentence says how that changes for Sticky.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://
to you. You RTFMd someone
pretty hard my first week here, and I was a bit snotty to you; clearly
it wasn't justified. --j ]
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashwo
t in parallel?
And does anyone know if those traps include the MAC address of the
rising device, or whether I'm going to have to go poll the MIB?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Thin
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:19:44AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:10:37PM -, Nair wrote:
> > >Could you pls let me know usage of check_smtp to exceute an
> > >smtp command and display
I think, Nagios Exchange, that
ought to give you a pretty strong hint.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:14:01PM +0100, Gavin Williams wrote:
> Just to clarify, I'm using NRPE_Nt, with Nagios 2.0x and check_nrpe on
> Windows Server 2003.
Yup; that was a good thing to clarify. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
r your nrpe.cfg file says the daemon should run
as -- it actually seems to default to nobody...)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associate
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 01:03:21PM +, Melanie Pfefer wrote:
> mycompany.com smtp:smtp:ip_adddress_of_my_new_exchange
If that's a copy and paste, note that you did "smtp:" *twice*.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL P
t that it might be productive to aim
tcpdump at that segment and let Windows do it. You might gain some
useful insight as to how they're doing it... which combined with the
smbclient sources, might tell you if it's possible.
Of course, that's probably a last resort, but at least it&#
ten
do you do that?
I'm just not sure I can envision a *better* architecture for it, either...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth &am
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:56:05PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> It is not a variable *in the shell*.
>
> If you're manually testing a nagios commandline in the shell, you have
> to substitute in valid values for the values by hand.
Nagios*.
It is not a variable *in the shell*.
If you're manually testing a nagios commandline in the shell, you have
to substitute in valid values for the values by hand.
Cheers
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
n I'm comfortable with.
Commercial solutions for this are $5k, which I won't get.
A couple hours of an electrician on a Saturday, to put boxes in front
of the panels to loop the feeders through, to where I can separate
them, and put CTs on them in a box with no exposed HV, yeah.
I'm
[ inadvertantly didn't send these to the list ]
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:29:45AM -0400, Jonathan Dill wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> >Aha!
> >Thanks. It ain't wireless, but at the price, I also don't care. :-)
>
>
I also don't care. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 01:53:47PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> LaCrosse, for example, has 10-channel capable wireless temp and
> possible temp/hyg sensor/transmitters for very close to $20 each... but
> while they have a PC interface, it's not clear at all whether the
> inte
r in my machine room, and temp sensors in each of my 4
breaker panels, to start. $150 sensors are a non-starter)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashwo
ask a potentially stupid question?
Why check_by_ssh instead of nrpe? Admittedly, nrpe wasn't the
*easiest* thing I've ever configured, but I did manage to get it
running reliably in about 2 hours.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
see it break when you run it manually, but it breaks how
frequently when you let Nagios run it?
Side question to all: is there a way to configure nagios to drop into a
log file somewhere *precisely* what it hands off to a shell or exec
when it runs a check-command?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
get 100 hits?
Same question *with* local caching.
We're about reliability on this question, I think.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth
you tested to make sure
that that name can be reliably, repeatably, resolved?
Does the command return the expected results from the command line if
you run it 100 times in a row?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D
is is the
problem if all your remote checks pass, but the status on the service
detail is "NRPE v2.5.1" or suchlike).
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:22:55AM +0100, Hari Sekhon wrote:
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> >I'm putting this on servers that, typically, have no humans logged in
> >at all.
> >
> >Since that's true, I'd like to have the list of users from who -q
> >re
mit a patch to do this?
b) How long can that status message become without breaking 1) nagios
and 2) nrpe?
Anyone have opinions, answers, or pointers?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things
h :( if that's the case)
No, if you can get to that point from the command line on the
monitoring machine, then you should be ok into Nagios, I would expect.
I see that the first hyphen on the response line is *not* followed by a
space, as I've come to expect... but I'
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:34:05PM +0200, Gerhard Lausser wrote:
> (There is the option "nologfilenocry" which can be set in a
> configurationfile. With this option, a missing logfile is silently
> tolerated).
It's your plugin, then?
That's a *classic* switch na
rminal Services
> > is_volatile 1
>
> RTFM.
Oh, goodie.
I was so hoping I'd find we had someone like *you* on the user support
mailing list, Marc.
Cheers,
-- jr '' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL
says this then ?
What *I* don't know is why the code can't give a better error.
The target machine's nrpe log will though usually tell you you couldn't
connect.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
