Re: [Nagios-users] [Nagios-devel] RFC/RFP Nagios command workers

2011-06-30 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 06/30/2011 11:58 PM, Adam Augustine wrote: > > There seem to be two issues, I think, that are getting mixed here. I think > the accusation of Mozilla Firefox/Nagios Core feature stagnation is a > separate issue from > putting things in core as opposed to making them a NEB module. > > The Linux

Re: [Nagios-users] [Nagios-devel] RFC/RFP Nagios command workers

2011-06-30 Thread Adam Augustine
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > On 06/28/2011 05:13 PM, Matthieu Kermagoret wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > First of all, sorry for the delayed response, last month was pretty > > crazy at work :-p > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > >> On 0

Re: [Nagios-users] [Nagios-devel] RFC/RFP Nagios command workers

2011-06-29 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 06/28/2011 05:13 PM, Matthieu Kermagoret wrote: > Hi list, > > First of all, sorry for the delayed response, last month was pretty > crazy at work :-p > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Andreas Ericsson wrote: >> On 05/23/2011 11:37 AM, Matthieu Kermagoret wrote: >> Because shipping an off

Re: [Nagios-users] [Nagios-devel] RFC/RFP Nagios command workers

2011-05-23 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 05/23/2011 11:37 AM, Matthieu Kermagoret wrote: > >> The idea to solve all of that is to fork() off a set of worker >> threads at startup that free()'s all possible memory and re-connects >> to the master process via a unix domain socket (or network socket >> that by default only listens to the