On 01/09/2012 08:18 PM, Michael Friedrich wrote:
Robert V. Bolton wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Michael Friedrich
michael.friedr...@univie.ac.at
mailto:michael.friedr...@univie.ac.at wrote:
there's a patch for nagios around, adding address6 as host attribute.
even if
On 10.01.2012 10:51, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
sure, the patch needs some rework, but when done, it fits, even it won't
make it upstream due to the change of the objects abi. but for safety
reasons in upgrading, your solution is better.
We might turn address into an array variable later. I'm
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de wrote:
Hi,
i am thinking about the monitoring with dualstack targets/hosts. I'd expect
all our hosts and services to be dual stacked or at least single stacked
services
to be the exception.
So adding a v6 host for all v4 hosts
Florian Lohoff wrote:
Hi,
i am thinking about the monitoring with dualstack targets/hosts. I'd expect
all our hosts and services to be dual stacked or at least single stacked
services
to be the exception.
So adding a v6 host for all v4 hosts seems so odd. I was thinking about adding
some
Michael Friedrich wrote:
Florian Lohoff wrote:
Hi,
i am thinking about the monitoring with dualstack targets/hosts. I'd expect
all our hosts and services to be dual stacked or at least single stacked
services
to be the exception.
So adding a v6 host for all v4 hosts seems so odd. I was
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Michael Friedrich
michael.friedr...@univie.ac.at wrote:
there's a patch for nagios around, adding address6 as host attribute.
even if there are custom variables, it's more intentional for keeping
the systems dualstacked in the future by adding that.
You
Robert V. Bolton wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Michael Friedrich
michael.friedr...@univie.ac.at
mailto:michael.friedr...@univie.ac.at wrote:
there's a patch for nagios around, adding address6 as host attribute.
even if there are custom variables, it's more intentional for
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:23:13AM -0700, Robert V. Bolton wrote:
Hi Flo,
At work we have started to go dualstack with all of our servers. Currently
our web servers are 100% dualstack so most of our monitoring dualstack
experience is based off of these servers. We have noticed that IPv4
