OiTalvez quando voce não configura, o valor default é baixo... Tente aumentar bem o número e monitore o consumo do servidor com o SAR.Um teste legal é enviar comando passivo ou reconhecerum estado de alarme. Se demorar a processar é porque a fila tá grande e é preciso paralelizar...
2006/7/28,
define service{
use generic-service ; Name of
service template to usehost_name nagonet
service_description Current Load
is_volatile 0
check_period
Hi Guys,
I'm using NRPE on a Fedora Core 2 box.
I'm using the following line in /etc/nrpe.cfg to check the disk:
command[check_disk4]=/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_disk -w 20 -c 10 -p
/dev/hdd1
Here is what df -k gives me that disk:
/dev/hdd1241263968 136218652 105045316 57%
Jan,Can you try the snapshot at http://nagiosplug.sf.net/snapshot. There have been fixes to check_disk so it should be the same output as df.TonOn 2 Aug 2006, at 08:58, Jan van der Merwe wrote:Hi Guys,I'm using NRPE on a Fedora Core 2 box.I'm using the following line in /etc/nrpe.cfg to check the
my problem when verify is clear, now the problem is there are several warning when i try to starting nagios, and it won't stop, the warning is: Nagios 2.5 starting... (PID=29468) sh: /usr/local/nagios//libexec/check_load: No such file or directory Warning: Return code of 127 for check of service
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Arief Iqbal
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:06 AM
To: nagios milis
Subject: [Nagios-users] Please Help!! another error on starting nagios
my problem when verify is clear, now the problem is
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Morris, Patrick wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Arief Iqbal
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:06 AM
To: nagios milis
Subject: [Nagios-users] Please Help!! another error on starting nagios
my problem
In my checkcommands.cfg for this host in question, I have:
# 'check_local_disk' command definition
define command{
command_name check_local_disk
command_line $USER1$/check_disk -w $ARG1$ -c $ARG2$ -p $ARG3$
}
# 'check_local_load' command definition
define command{
command_name
Scott, yeah it's an email word wrap issue.On 8/2/06, Scott Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
define service{use
generic-service ; Name
of service template to
usehost_name
nagonetservice_description
Current Loadis_volatile
0check_period24x7max_check_attempts4normal_check_interval
Hello,I have a problem when I try to make a check_ping with NRPE... It shows the follow message: NRPE: Command 'check_ping' not defined Anyone could help me?? I don't known what to do (more.. hehe)...Thanks
-
Take Surveys.
Title: NSCA --daemon problem: too many child process
Dear All:
I have a Nagios distributed setup (Central: Solaris 9, sparc , 1 GB RAM, Nagios 2.4, nsca 2.6/Distributed: Solaris 10, sparc , 1 GB RAM, Nagios 2.4, nsca 2.6) monitoring more than 600 servers and 2000+ services. I am running
Hi Folks.
I thought I had selected Reply to all, but it seems my post did not
include Arief in the To:.
Sorry if you are reading this twice.
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Simon J. Hernandez wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Morris, Patrick wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After trying to work with Nagios for a while, I've determined that it's
not the best fit for most of the environments I work with. Looks like
great stuff, but takes too long to setup, configure, and get running in
network environments where I would leave it with administrators will
little to
You can also use NC_Net to access this performance counters.
Or you can retrieve the value throughWMI using NC_NEt
Current version on sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nc-net
TOny
On 7/28/06, Phil Costelloe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frost, Mark {PBG} wrote: We have a need on a Windows
-Original Message-
From: Justin Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 8:38 AM
To: Marc Powell
Cc: Nagios Users Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Warning threshold must be float or float
triplet!
In my checkcommands.cfg for this host in question,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 31.07.2006 19:42:08:
Pardon me. But what is the problem? You have a problem. It triggers an
alert. You act and 'fix' it by scheduling downtime. Then you bring the
system alive within the allocated maintenance window.
I'm sorry, but I got a hard time to pardon such
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
|Every admin that is currently offsite can't know about the reboot
|(cause it happened in downtime and noone noticed despite the one who
|rebooted) and will never get notified about the recovery. That poses a
|big problem for bigger companies who have numerous admins
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 8:54 AM
To: Nagios Users Mailinglist
Subject: [Nagios-users] Antwort: Re: Recovery not getting
sent duringdowntime?
There's a big point in
You, sir, are a genius!!
Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Steven Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 1, 2006 9:39 AM
To: Janet Post
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] How to monitor transient services?
On 27/07/2006, at 12:11 AM, Janet Post
jon.johnston wrote:
After trying to work with Nagios for a while, I've determined that it's
not the best fit for most of the environments I work with. Looks like
great stuff, but takes too long to setup, configure, and get running in
network environments where I would leave it with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.08.2006 18:04:06:
The problem is that it sounds like you're using scheduled downtimes
incorrectly. It's not meant to be used for *un*scheduled downtimes; thus
the name. It's meant to supress alerts from a machine during the
specified window, and that's exactly
Hi,
I think you might want to rethink your process so that it matches the
paradigm of the tool you are using. It already can do what you want if
you just work with the way it was designed, rather than forcing a
process that breaks the paradigm.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Responses inline.
The problem is that it sounds like you're using scheduled downtimes
incorrectly. It's not meant to be used for *un*scheduled downtimes;
thus the name. It's meant to supress alerts from a machine
during the
specified window, and that's exactly what it's doing in
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, jon.johnston wrote:
After trying to work with Nagios for a while, I've determined that it's
not the best fit for most of the environments I work with. Looks like
great stuff, but takes too long to setup, configure, and get running in
network environments where I would
okay i modified checkcommands.cfg to reflect what you noted here.
I also did a ps axu | grep nagios and AGAIN there are multiple
instances running. here is the output:
nagios 6155 0.0 0.0 1700
536 ? S
11:57 0:00 /bin/ping -n -U -w 10 -c 5 204.64.105.21
nagios 6157 0.0 0.2 23900 1464
? S
11:57
Hello,
I am having the follow problem with the check_ping running over nrpe:
check_ping: %s: Warning threshold must be integer or percentage!
Anyone have any idea of what is happening? :/
Thanks
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
On 8/2/06, jon.johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After trying to work with Nagios for a while, I've determined that it's
not the best fit for most of the environments I work with. Looks like
great stuff, but takes too long to setup, configure, and get running in
network environments where I
These could be normal. Nagios will spawn a child process to manage each
check. What you're interested in is if there are multiple nagios process
with a parent PID of 1. ps -ef usually shows child/parent PIDS. If you
stop nagios and see none remaining then you don't have multiple daemons
running.
Hello
A new user for nagios
I cant get nagios to start
when i say
service nagios start
it says
Starting netwrok monitor:
nagios
su:warning :cannot change directory to
/home/nagios :no such file or directory
where exactly is this folder in so i can
change It
i went Into the
Sorry for this delay guys.
I am using Debian 3.1
Thanks for any hint.
Marcos Marinho
Analista de Redes
Rede Anhanguera de Comunicação
(19) 3772-8084
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Felipe
Tocchetto
Enviada em: terça-feira, 1 de agosto de
Here is my log file with respect to my last post that nagios
wont start
[1154544633] Nagios 2.5 starting...
(PID=21907)[1154544633] LOG VERSION: 2.0[1154544633] Finished
daemonizing... (New PID=21908)[1154544633] Error: Could not create external
command file
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006, Ganesh Vembu wrote:
Here is my log file with respect to my last post that nagios wont start
[1154544633] Nagios 2.5 starting... (PID=21907)
[1154544633] LOG VERSION: 2.0
[1154544633] Finished daemonizing... (New PID=21908)
[1154544633] Error: Could not create external
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 11:59 -0700, Ganesh Vembu wrote:
Here is my log file with respect to my last post that nagios wont
start
[1154544633] Nagios 2.5 starting... (PID=21907)
[1154544633] LOG VERSION: 2.0
[1154544633] Finished daemonizing... (New PID=21908)
[1154544633] Error: Could not
hello all
thank you for the super fast reply
yes i ran the make
install-commandmode
i have the rw directory and the .cmd file under
there
now i have the log saying
[1154546913] Nagios 2.5 starting... (PID=22549)[1154546913] LOG
VERSION: 2.0[1154546913] Lockfile
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 12:38 -0700, Ganesh Vembu wrote:
and still its trying to reach the /home/nagios what do i have to
configure to get away from that
mkdir /home/nagios
chown nagios:nagios !$
as root
HTH
AVISO: A informação contida neste e-mail, bem como em qualquer de seus anexos,
I sent the reload command and basically nagios is now telling me 30 hosts are down and that number is increasing? This is a problem. why does this happen? And back to my original issue, nagios itself is still showing down. I modified the command as you suggested, how do I verify that?
This is
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006, Ganesh Vembu wrote:
[1154546923] SERVICE ALERT: localhost;Total
Processes;UNKNOWN;SOFT;3;check_procs: Unknown argument - (null)
and still its trying to reach the /home/nagios
what do i have to configure to get away from that
I'd highly recommend you read:
a) The
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every admin that is currently offsite can't know about the reboot
(cause it happened in downtime and noone noticed despite the one who
rebooted) and will never get notified about the recovery. That poses a
big problem for bigger companies who have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.08.2006 18:36:18:
I think you might want to rethink your process so that it matches the
paradigm of the tool you are using. It already can do what you want if
you just work with the way it was designed, rather than forcing a
process that breaks the paradigm.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.08.2006 18:42:56:
Or you could temporarily disable notifications for the host during the
reboot. The Nagios docs are pretty clear that [w]hen a host a service
is in a period of scheduled downtime, notifications for that host or
service will be suppressed.
jon.johnston wrote:
After trying to work with Nagios for a while, I've determined that it's
not the best fit for most of the environments I work with. Looks like
great stuff, but takes too long to setup, configure, and get running in
network environments where I would leave it with
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Craig
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:36 PM
To: Marc Powell
Cc: Nagios Users Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Warning threshold must be float or float
triplet!
I'm a VoIP engineer, don't know a lick of linux and was still able to
install fedora core 3 and compile nagios. It's worth diving
into.On 8/2/06, Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/2/06, jon.johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After trying to work with Nagios for a while, I've determined
Hello, Nagios Users,
I need to check_smtp without a PING check, but I can't get nagios to do
this. One of my customers insists on turning off ICMP, which I actually
have no problem with, except this one.
Here's the operative definitions I'm attempting:
# 'relay1' host definition
define
Don't give up. It is actually very easy to get running on a red hat or
fedora based system (prefers centos here). It took me forever to get it
running the first time because I kept missing stuff in the manual. If you
follow the directions it can be up and running in about 10 minutes. You
might
Hello, Nagios Users,
I need to check_smtp without a PING check, but I can't get
nagios to do this. One of my customers insists on turning off
ICMP, which I actually have no problem with, except this one.
Here's the operative definitions I'm attempting:
# 'relay1' host definition
Morris, Patrick wrote:
Hello, Nagios Users,
I need to check_smtp without a PING check, but I can't get
nagios to do this. One of my customers insists on turning off
ICMP, which I actually have no problem with, except this one.
Here's the operative definitions I'm attempting:
# 'relay1'
-Original Message-
From: Chris Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 7:30 PM
To: Morris, Patrick
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] disabled ping and check_smtp:
nagios won't not ping
Morris, Patrick wrote:
Hello,
Hello Israel.
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Israel Brewster wrote:
I have noticed that double slash in a number of places throughout the nagios
config files. In my experience, it has never caused any issues, either with
the functioning of nagios, or with other things such as when I accidentally
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 22:40:56 -0400
Morris, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you have a ping check defined somewhere, or you need to
reload/restart Nagios.
If restarting Nagios doesn't solve it (stop it first, and make sure
it's really stopped by checking a process list before
when i starting nagios, there's a warning: Nagios 2.5 starting... (PID=14518) Warning: Host performance file processing command 'process-host-perfdata-file' was not found - host performance data file will not be processed! Warning: Service performance file processing command
when i starting nagios, there's a warning:
Nagios 2.5 starting... (PID=14518)
Warning: Host performance file processing command
'process-host-perfdata-file' was not found - host performance
data file will not be processed!
Warning: Service performance file processing command
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 23:41:09 -0400
Morris, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 22:40:56 -0400
Morris, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you have a ping check defined somewhere, or you need to
reload/restart Nagios.
If restarting Nagios doesn't solve it
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.08.2006 18:36:18:
I think you might want to rethink your process so that it matches the
paradigm of the tool you are using. It already can do what you want if
you just work with the way it was designed, rather
54 matches
Mail list logo
