Re: [Nagios-users] check_nt - MEMORY USAGE - incorrect results
this because in your server 2008 you will see that there is a virtual memory activated, go to Computer proprieties and see in performences you will have for exemple for R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) – 12GB ram installed 12GB of virtual memory.Finaly, Nagios take the some of memories ( virual memory + RAM). 2013/1/9 Andrew Thompson and...@fulgent.co.uk Hi all, ** ** Using the supplied check_nt plugin to check Memory Usage on Windows servers. ** ** Some report correctly, others report a complete load of old tosh!!! ** ** I have tried 3 different versions of Windows OS, the version seems to make no odds. Doesn’t matter if 32 or 64 bit either. ** ** ** ** ** ** Some examples ** ** ** ** ** ** MY primary domain controller – Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) – 8GB ram installed ** ** Output from the check appears correct: Memory usage: total:8205.64 Mb - used: 2902.96 Mb (35%) - free: 5302.67 Mb (65%) ** ** ** ** ** ** Another 2008 R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) – 12GB ram installed ** ** Output thinks its got 24GB: Memory usage: total:24573.16 Mb - used: 1796.71 Mb (7%) - free: 22776.45 Mb (93%) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** A Server 2003 Standard (x86) box (an internal test web server) – 512MB ram installed ** ** Output thinks its got over 1GB: Memory usage: total:1257.50 Mb - used: 333.30 Mb (27%) - free: 924.20 Mb (73%) ** ** ** ** ** ** A Server 2012 (x64) box (with HyperV installed) – 28GB ram installed ** ** Output thinks tis got 32GB: Memory usage: total:32500.80 Mb - used: 16709.37 Mb (51%) - free: 15791.43 Mb (49%) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Anybody any ideas as to why check_nt is returning incorrect info. I know its incorrect but Nagios doesn’t so where exactly is it reading these values from? ** ** Thanks in advance for anybodies input. ** ** Regards ** ** ** ** ** ** -- Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Cordialement, Omar SADDIKI Master Réseaux et Systèmes -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_nt - MEMORY USAGE - incorrect results
Try www.edcint.co.nz/checkwmiplus using the checkmem mode and see if it works ok for you On 10/01/2013 7:55 PM, omar saddiki wrote: this because in your server 2008 you will see that there is a virtual memory activated, go to Computer proprieties and see in performences you will have for exemple for R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) -- 12GB ram installed 12GB of virtual memory.Finaly, Nagios take the some of memories ( virual memory + RAM). 2013/1/9 Andrew Thompson and...@fulgent.co.uk mailto:and...@fulgent.co.uk Hi all, Using the supplied check_nt plugin to check Memory Usage on Windows servers. Some report correctly, others report a complete load of old tosh!!! I have tried 3 different versions of Windows OS, the version seems to make no odds. Doesn't matter if 32 or 64 bit either. Some examples MY primary domain controller -- Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) -- 8GB ram installed Output from the check appears correct: Memory usage: total:8205.64 Mb - used: 2902.96 Mb (35%) - free: 5302.67 Mb (65%) Another 2008 R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) -- 12GB ram installed Output thinks its got 24GB: Memory usage: total:24573.16 Mb - used: 1796.71 Mb (7%) - free: 22776.45 Mb (93%) A Server 2003 Standard (x86) box (an internal test web server) -- 512MB ram installed Output thinks its got over 1GB: Memory usage: total:1257.50 Mb - used: 333.30 Mb (27%) - free: 924.20 Mb (73%) A Server 2012 (x64) box (with HyperV installed) -- 28GB ram installed Output thinks tis got 32GB: Memory usage: total:32500.80 Mb - used: 16709.37 Mb (51%) - free: 15791.43 Mb (49%) Anybody any ideas as to why check_nt is returning incorrect info. I know its incorrect but Nagios doesn't so where exactly is it reading these values from? Thanks in advance for anybodies input. Regards -- Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Cordialement, Omar SADDIKI Master Réseaux et Systèmes -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Smartmon System Monitoring http://www.smartmon.com.au www.smartmon.com.au http://www.smartmon.com.au -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_nt - MEMORY USAGE - incorrect results
Not entirely accurate. I just started troubleshooting a Win2008 R2 system yesterday - it has 16GB of physical RAM + 16 GB pagefile for a total of 32GB of virtual memory. The system is using 10.9GB of physical RAM, yet check_nt tells me it's using 2.69GB. Completely wrong, even if check_nt was only talking about physical, only talking about virtual, or talking about the sum. Solution? Remove yet another checkcommand using that outdated program. Benny this because in your server 2008 you will see that there is a virtual memory activated, go to Computer proprieties and see in performences you will have for exemple for R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) 12GB ram installed 12GB of virtual memory.Finaly, Nagios take the some of memories ( virual memory + RAM). 2013/1/9 Andrew Thompson and...@fulgent.co.uk Hi all, ** ** Using the supplied check_nt plugin to check Memory Usage on Windows servers. ** ** Some report correctly, others report a complete load of old tosh!!! ** ** I have tried 3 different versions of Windows OS, the version seems to make no odds. Doesnt matter if 32 or 64 bit either. ** ** ** ** ** ** Some examples ** ** ** ** ** ** MY primary domain controller Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) 8GB ram installed ** ** Output from the check appears correct: Memory usage: total:8205.64 Mb - used: 2902.96 Mb (35%) - free: 5302.67 Mb (65%) ** ** ** ** ** ** Another 2008 R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) 12GB ram installed ** ** Output thinks its got 24GB: Memory usage: total:24573.16 Mb - used: 1796.71 Mb (7%) - free: 22776.45 Mb (93%) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** A Server 2003 Standard (x86) box (an internal test web server) 512MB ram installed ** ** Output thinks its got over 1GB: Memory usage: total:1257.50 Mb - used: 333.30 Mb (27%) - free: 924.20 Mb (73%) ** ** ** ** ** ** A Server 2012 (x64) box (with HyperV installed) 28GB ram installed ** ** Output thinks tis got 32GB: Memory usage: total:32500.80 Mb - used: 16709.37 Mb (51%) - free: 15791.43 Mb (49%) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Anybody any ideas as to why check_nt is returning incorrect info. I know its incorrect but Nagios doesnt so where exactly is it reading these values from? ** ** Thanks in advance for anybodies input. ** ** Regards ** ** ** ** ** ** -- Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Cordialement, Omar SADDIKI Master Réseaux et Systèmes -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, 'You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.' -- George Carlin -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_nt - MEMORY USAGE - incorrect results
check_nt 's MEMUSE includes the page file. If you use checkMem via NRPE you can choose only physical http://www.nsclient.org/nscp/wiki/CheckSystem/checkMem Scott Wilkerson Technical Support Specialist ___ Email: swilker...@nagios.com Web: www.nagios.com On 1/9/2013 11:55 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote: Hi all, Using the supplied check_nt plugin to check Memory Usage on Windows servers. Some report correctly, others report a complete load of old tosh!!! I have tried 3 different versions of Windows OS, the version seems to make no odds. Doesn't matter if 32 or 64 bit either. Some examples MY primary domain controller -- Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) -- 8GB ram installed Output from the check appears correct: Memory usage: total:8205.64 Mb - used: 2902.96 Mb (35%) - free: 5302.67 Mb (65%) Another 2008 R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) -- 12GB ram installed Output thinks its got 24GB: Memory usage: total:24573.16 Mb - used: 1796.71 Mb (7%) - free: 22776.45 Mb (93%) A Server 2003 Standard (x86) box (an internal test web server) -- 512MB ram installed Output thinks its got over 1GB: Memory usage: total:1257.50 Mb - used: 333.30 Mb (27%) - free: 924.20 Mb (73%) A Server 2012 (x64) box (with HyperV installed) -- 28GB ram installed Output thinks tis got 32GB: Memory usage: total:32500.80 Mb - used: 16709.37 Mb (51%) - free: 15791.43 Mb (49%) Anybody any ideas as to why check_nt is returning incorrect info. I know its incorrect but Nagios doesn't so where exactly is it reading these values from? Thanks in advance for anybodies input. Regards -- Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_nt - MEMORY USAGE - incorrect results
Thankyou I will look at this instead. Thanks to all for your input and help From: Scott Wilkerson [mailto:swilker...@nagios.com] Sent: 10 January 2013 14:03 To: Nagios Users List Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] check_nt - MEMORY USAGE - incorrect results check_nt 's MEMUSE includes the page file. If you use checkMem via NRPE you can choose only physical http://www.nsclient.org/nscp/wiki/CheckSystem/checkMem Scott Wilkerson Technical Support Specialist ___ Email: swilker...@nagios.com mailto:swilker...@nagios.com Web: www.nagios.com http://www.nagios.com On 1/9/2013 11:55 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote: Hi all, Using the supplied check_nt plugin to check Memory Usage on Windows servers. Some report correctly, others report a complete load of old tosh!!! I have tried 3 different versions of Windows OS, the version seems to make no odds. Doesn't matter if 32 or 64 bit either. Some examples MY primary domain controller - Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) - 8GB ram installed Output from the check appears correct: Memory usage: total:8205.64 Mb - used: 2902.96 Mb (35%) - free: 5302.67 Mb (65%) Another 2008 R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) - 12GB ram installed Output thinks its got 24GB: Memory usage: total:24573.16 Mb - used: 1796.71 Mb (7%) - free: 22776.45 Mb (93%) A Server 2003 Standard (x86) box (an internal test web server) - 512MB ram installed Output thinks its got over 1GB: Memory usage: total:1257.50 Mb - used: 333.30 Mb (27%) - free: 924.20 Mb (73%) A Server 2012 (x64) box (with HyperV installed) - 28GB ram installed Output thinks tis got 32GB: Memory usage: total:32500.80 Mb - used: 16709.37 Mb (51%) - free: 15791.43 Mb (49%) Anybody any ideas as to why check_nt is returning incorrect info. I know its incorrect but Nagios doesn't so where exactly is it reading these values from? Thanks in advance for anybodies input. Regards -- Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] New check_openmanage error after updating to OMSA 7.2.0-4
Updated to OMSA 7.2.0.4 on a CentOS 6.3 x86_64 box today, and just got this new error when trying to run the check_openmanage nagios plugin: # /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_openmanage Memory module 2 [DIMM3, 4096 MB]: Single-bit warning error rate exceeded, Single-bit failure error rate exceeded Cache Battery 0 in controller 0 is Learning (Active) [probably harmless] INTERNAL ERROR: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_openmanage line 1656. I'm running check_openmanage 3.7.8 (installed via the repos). I see the latest version is 3.7.9 on Trond's website. Any ideas if that will fix the issue? Googling the error produced nothing. Thanks, SteveJ -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] New check_openmanage error after updating to OMSA 7.2.0-4
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Steve Jenkins stevejenk...@gmail.comwrote: I see the latest version is 3.7.9 on Trond's website. Any ideas if that will fix the issue? Googling the error produced nothing. And... to answer my own question, yes - 3.7.9 does indeed fix this. New version is probably already in the repos, waiting out the testing period. But at least now this error message will be in the archives, so Google can find it an help the next guy. :) Thanks, SteveJ -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] New check_openmanage error after updating to OMSA 7.2.0-4
Steve Jenkins stevejenk...@gmail.com writes: And... to answer my own question, yes - 3.7.9 does indeed fix this. New version is probably already in the repos, waiting out the testing period. Not sure which repos you're referring to, but I'll assume Fedora and/or Fedora EPEL. I didn't get around to submitting updates until today. They should arrive in the testing repos in a couple of days. The updates need to stay in testing for a week for Fedora and two weeks for EPEL before they can be pushed to stable. If you can't wait, you can download the RPMs via the Fedora build system, you'll find links here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/nagios-plugins-openmanage When it has arrived in testing (and in your local mirror), you can install it with (example for EPEL): yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nagios-plugins-openmanage Cheers, -- Trond H. Amundsen t.h.amund...@usit.uio.no Center for Information Technology Services, University of Oslo -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] New check_openmanage error after updating to OMSA 7.2.0-4
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Trond Hasle Amundsen t.h.amund...@usit.uio.no wrote: Not sure which repos you're referring to, but I'll assume Fedora and/or Fedora EPEL. Yep - those are the ones I was referring to. :) I didn't get around to submitting updates until today. They should arrive in the testing repos in a couple of days. The updates need to stay in testing for a week for Fedora and two weeks for EPEL before they can be pushed to stable. If you can't wait, you can download the RPMs via the Fedora build system, you'll find links here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/nagios-plugins-openmanage When it has arrived in testing (and in your local mirror), you can install it with (example for EPEL): yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nagios-plugins-openmanage Thanks, Trond. I'm actually the Fedora packager for OpenDKIM ( https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/opendkim) so I'm often dealing with those same deadlines. :) I'll keep an eye out for it to be pushed to testing! Thanks and keep up the great work! :) SteveJ -- Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Service Alert History - No history information was found for this service in this archived log file
Hello I am having an issue where Nagios is not finding alert history in the nagios log files. eg. I have a service called cpu on host PR-GGM-CR-DC01. prl@PR-PRO-CR-NAG02:/usr/local/nagios/var/archives$ grep 'PR-GGM-CR-DC01;cpu' nagios-01-11-2013-00.log [1357747200] CURRENT SERVICE STATE: PR-GGM-CR-DC01;cpu;OK;HARD;1;VM_STAT OK - One minute average CPU usage is 4.94% prl@PR-PRO-CR-NAG02:/usr/local/nagios/var/archives$ grep 'PR-GGM-CR-DC01;cpu' nagios-01-10-2013-00.log [1357660800] CURRENT SERVICE STATE: PR-GGM-CR-DC01;cpu;OK;HARD;1;VM_STAT OK - One minute average CPU usage is 4.99% Yet when I visit alert history for this service I get the No history information message. Anyone know what is going on? Regards, Sam -- Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
