Re: [Nagios-users] NDO update delay

2009-04-01 Thread Rodney Ramos
Hi Lei.

I´m using MyISAM engine.

Thanks,
Rodney.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:59 AM, lei chen clo...@gmail.com wrote:

 The primary reason maybe the low performance in your mysql server with
 innodb engine.

 Two solutions:
 1. tuning your my.cnf to improve the mysql performance;
 2. use MyISAM instead of InnoDB engine in your NODUtils db;

 2009/3/26 Rodney Ramos rodne...@gmail.com:
   Hi everybody.
 
  I´ve installed NDOUtils (nodutils-1.4b7) whith Nagios (nagios-3.0.6) and
  it´s working.
 
  However I´ve noticed that it´s taking more than 30 minutes to update the
  MySQL tables.
 
  I´ve detected the problem making a query on the field last_check on
  nagios_hoststatus table.
 
  Can anyone help me? There is a parameter to make the update process
 faster?
 
  Thanks,
  Rodney.
 
 --
 
  ___
  Nagios-users mailing list
  Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
  ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
 reporting
  any issue.
  ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
 



 --
 Thanks,
 Chenlei  石头++
  MSN Messenger: c...@163.com

--
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] NDO update delay

2009-03-27 Thread Rodney Ramos
Sorry, Jim, but my problem is not with Nagios startup. The problem is that
NDOUtils does not update MySQL tables fast. It takes more than 30 minutos do
make an update.

As I´ve told, I´ve noticed that making a query on the nagios_hoststatus
table.

Does anybody has a similiar problem? Has anybody made a query on this table
and compare de last_chek value with the Last Check value showed by Nagios?

Thanks,
Rodney.



On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jim Avery j...@jimavery.me.uk wrote:

 2009/3/26 Rodney Ramos rodne...@gmail.com:
   Hi everybody.
 
  I´ve installed NDOUtils (nodutils-1.4b7) whith Nagios (nagios-3.0.6) and
  it´s working.
 
  However I´ve noticed that it´s taking more than 30 minutes to update the
  MySQL tables.
 
  I´ve detected the problem making a query on the field last_check on
  nagios_hoststatus table.
 
  Can anyone help me? There is a parameter to make the update process
 faster?


 You can try reducing the number of days data you keep and adding some
 indexes.  The solution I think helps most though was contributed by
 Marc DeTrano here in a thread here on 3rd/4th March which I summarised
 thus:

 I simply added a file nagios.cnf
 under /etc/mysql/conf.d like so:

  [mysqld]
  innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 2

 and it reduced my Nagios startup time from more than 3 minutes to only
 30 seconds!

 I already had quite a few of the data_processing_options disabled in
 ndomod.cfg and had reduced all of the max_*_age parameters in
 ndo2db.cfg to 24 hours (before those my startup time was more than 5
 minutes).

--
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] NDO update delay

2009-03-26 Thread Rodney Ramos
Hi everybody.

I´ve installed NDOUtils (nodutils-1.4b7) whith Nagios (nagios-3.0.6) and
it´s working.

However I´ve noticed that it´s taking more than 30 minutes to update the
MySQL tables.

I´ve detected the problem making a query on the field last_check on
nagios_hoststatus table.

Can anyone help me? There is a parameter to make the update process faster?

Thanks,
Rodney.
--
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] Check attempt number do not reset

2009-03-05 Thread Rodney Ramos
I´m noticing that, sometimes, the check attempt number do not reset to 1
after a recovery state, as we can see below:

[1236254782] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;1;No route to host
[1236254852] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;UP;SOFT;2;TCP OK - 0.519 second response
time on port 135
[1236255172] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;2;CRITICAL - Socket timeout
after 10 seconds   Should be SOFT:1, not SOFT:2
[1236255242] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;3;Network is unreachable
[1236255312] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;HARD;4;Network is unreachable

Is this a normal behaviour or is it a Nagios problem?

Thanks in advance,
Rodney.
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] Check attempt number do not reset

2009-03-05 Thread Rodney Ramos
Hi, Marc.

Thank you for your answer.

Do you think that just after a HARD UP the check number should be reset to
1?

I don´t think so. Look at other messages log, for the same host:


[1236260301] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;1;Network is unreachable
[1236260361] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;UP;SOFT;2;TCP OK - 0.538 second response
time on port 135
[1236260681] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;1;Network is unreachable
[1236260751] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;2;Network is unreachable
[1236260821] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;3;Network is unreachable
[1236260891] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;HARD;4;Network is unreachable
In this example, after the UP;SOFT;2 we had a DOWN;SOFT;1.

That is my doubt? Someties Nagios resets the check number, sometimes it
doesn´t.

Thank you again.
Rodney.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Marc Powell m...@ena.com wrote:


 On Mar 5, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Rodney Ramos wrote:

  I´m noticing that, sometimes, the check attempt number do not reset
  to 1 after a recovery state, as we can see below:
 
  [1236254782] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;1;No route to host
  [1236254852] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;UP;SOFT;2;TCP OK - 0.519 second
  response time on port 135

 ^ Wasn't in a HARD OK state yet so hadn't _really_ recovered.

  [1236255172] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;2;CRITICAL - Socket
  timeout after 10 seconds   Should be SOFT:1, not SOFT:2
  [1236255242] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;SOFT;3;Network is unreachable
  [1236255312] HOST ALERT: sani6as05;DOWN;HARD;4;Network is unreachable
 
  Is this a normal behaviour or is it a Nagios problem?

 Doesn't appear to be a bug, IMHO.

 --
 Marc



 --
 Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco,
 CA
 -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the
 Enterprise
 -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source
 participation
 -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code:
 SFAD
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
 ___
 Nagios-users mailing list
 Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
 ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
 reporting any issue.
 ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] NRPE Problems

2007-08-31 Thread Rodney Ramos
I´m testing Nagios NRPE and I´m finding serveral problems.

I´m working with:
- Nagios 2.9 on Solaris 9 (last CVS patch).
- NRPE 2.8.1 on Solaris 8 (last CVS patch).
- gcc 3.4.6

1) When I try to start a daemon using NRPE, I receive the message
CHECK_NRPE: Socket timeout after 10 seconds., although the service is
started.

 check_nrpe -H remote_machine -n -p 5666 -c start_daemon
CHECK_NRPE: Socket timeout after 10 seconds.

In the remote machine I have in the nrpe.cfg:

command[start_daemon]=/usr/local/bin/sudo /usr/local/nagios/bin/teste_daemon

My teste_daemon is:

#!/usr/bin/perl

use POSIX;

chroot(/usr/local/nagios/bin)
or die Couldn't chroot: $!;

$pid = fork;
if ($pid) {
print OK\n;
exit 0;
}
die Couldn't fork: $! unless defined($pid);

POSIX::setsid() or die Can't start a new session: $!;

while (1) {

sleep 10;

}

exit 0;

---

It seems that the NRPE waits an output message from the teste_daemon that
does not come (?!).

2) When I try to check a process using the plugin check_procs via NRPE the
number of process running is added by one.

Example:

 check_nrpe -H remote_machine -n -p 5666 -c check_daemon
PROCS CRITICAL: 2 processes with args 'teste_daemon'

In the nrpe.cfg, I have:

command[check_daemon]=/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_procs -c 1:1 -a
teste_daemon

But, when I run check_procs -c 1:1 -a teste_daemon on the remote machine,
I have:

PROCS OK: 1 process with args 'teste_daemon'

The solution was to change the command to check_procs -c 1:1 -p 1 -a
teste_daemon,
but it isn´t what I´m looking for.

3) I couldn´t configure NRPE to run with the inetd. It always answers with a
SSL error message, even with
the -n flag in both side.

So I found several problems with NRPE that are difficulting my job. I was
intending to put Nagios to
monitoring more than 3500 machines but after this problems I don´t know if
other people of my group
will feel comfortable to use this tool. Thats is a pity, because I found
Nagios a excellent monitoring tool,
very flexible, but I don´t know if other people will buy the fight to change
our actual tool to Nagios.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] Nagios SIGHUP problem

2007-08-30 Thread Rodney Ramos
I´m having a problem when I try to reload Nagios 2.9. When I run kill -HUP
nagios_pid, it ends up with SIGEXIT.

In the nagios.log we have Caught SIGEXIT, shutting down

I´m running Nagios 2.9 in Solaris 9, gcc-3-4-6.

I´ve read that this a problema in the char *sigs[] definition on the
nagios.c file.

Does anyone knows how to solve this problema?

Thanks.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null