Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++. Monitoring the devices behind theFirewall.

2011-03-18 Thread Sal Ila
Thank you very much for your feedback. I have got some good ideas from you! I work in the IT Security and these kind of scenarios are quite common. Among the list of proposed solutions, the NSClient++ passive check seems the most appropriate. In fact, the mechanism I have configured seems using a

Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++. Monitoring the devices behind theFirewall.

2011-03-15 Thread Daniel Wittenberg
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++. Monitoring the devices behind theFirewall. On 15 March 2011 13:47, C. Bensend be...@bennyvision.com wrote: If you're looking to do this without cooperation from the client and their security folks, you're going to run into problems.  If they want you

Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++. Monitoring the devices behind theFirewall.

2011-03-15 Thread Jim Avery
On 15 March 2011 14:34, Daniel Wittenberg daniel.wittenberg.r...@statefarm.com wrote: You could always have a passive check that calls home to get any new updates so then you wouldn't really have to login to each one to push down changes. Dan That's a neat idea!