Chance:
that want 4 X 10 GbE on each module (8 slot chassis). I
expect this will be a perfect 40G throughput since I've never
seen us do anything less than perfect (been working here
since August).
Oh phuleeese Stop drinking your own Kool-Aid(tm). To honestly
suggest that
Richard:
And if^H^Hwhen you run into a really fun issue, don't even think
about calling Foundry TAC after hours, all you'll get is someone's house
with their screaming kids in the background.
Our TAC is 24/7 and has been 24/7 for years. I work in the Support Center
for Japan. We have not
Just wondering if anyone else has seen this happen recently:
https://uni01nf.unity.ncsu.edu/ncsu/usage/io-fps-service-daily.html
We maxed out at about 10,000 flows/sec. I'm currently going back through
our argus logs and collecting a list of source hosts (all appear to be
spoofed of
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Brian Wilson wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else has seen this happen recently:
https://uni01nf.unity.ncsu.edu/ncsu/usage/io-fps-service-daily.html
We maxed out at about 10,000 flows/sec. I'm currently going back through
our argus logs and collecting a
On 2002-05-21-01:12:25, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used a Cisco 7200 VXR with NPE-400. I used two different 7200's
with the exact same results. Bidirectional throughput on 1GbE is a
fraction above 10%. Unidirectional is a bit better (23%). Singl
line ACL drops it to 8% (permit ip
In the immortal words of Mitch Halmu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(Rev. Martin Niemoller, 1945)
Congratulations, Mitch, you have done what many of us would have
considered impossible: you have surpassed your own previous high-water
mark for tasteless, self-involved bullshit. (Which, for the
Hi, Brian.
] https://uni01nf.unity.ncsu.edu/ncsu/usage/io-fps-service-daily.html
There is a huge increase in FTP scanning as well as the building of
warez botnets. The warez scanning is generally for anonymous FTP
servers with plentiful bandwidth, copious disk space, and generous write
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 04:55:51PM +0900, Gary wrote:
Richard:
And if^H^Hwhen you run into a really fun issue, don't even think
about calling Foundry TAC after hours, all you'll get is someone's house
with their screaming kids in the background.
Our TAC is 24/7 and has been 24/7 for
Rob Thomas wrote:
There is a huge increase in FTP scanning as well as the building of
warez botnets. The warez scanning is generally for anonymous FTP
servers with plentiful bandwidth, copious disk space, and generous
write permissions. ...
One things I know of that helps here is to
In addition to David's suggestion, you would also want to ensure that
newly create files are umasked unreadable as well. Should the directory
be masked unreadable but still executable (which it must be to actually
enter it) users could still externally link to the files, even though
one
I saw a similar type of attack at the same time to one of my
customers.. not got all the details in yet, odd tho. If anyone knows more
will you CC me in case its related,
Cheers
STeve
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Brian Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Brian Wilson wrote:
Just
I don't really trust the vmstat system time numbers. Based on some
suggestions I received, I ran some CPU intensive benchmarks during
different traffic loads, and determined how much system time was being
used by comparing the real and user times. The results seem to show that
if I want to do
We can hope cant we? Forward from another list:
Spammers could face fines
Reuters
May 17, 2002, 12:20 PM PT
A bill aimed at limiting unwanted junk e-mail was approved and sent
to the floor by the Senate Commerce Committee on Friday with
unanimous support from Democrats and Republicans. It
I recall that, early in my career I had the opportunity to build a new
LAN backbone for a 6 story office building. It was going to be Category
5! Woohoo. With a 12/24 fiber backbone.
ATM in a LAN environment was new at the time but I was going to make
sure I had an OC3 backhauling each of the
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
So, regardless of whether the hardware is the fastest thing on the
block, pushing 10 nanobits at a megaflop, you can look like a fool if
you don't consider the business repercussions of the vendor you choose.
In the end, I didn't get my
Good point! The other one is Choose your battles wisely.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:52 PM
To: Christopher J. Wolff
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The business side of the coin. WAS RE: The
For those saying Cisco is so great, it's still fucked up pretty bad. IOS
12.1 and later doesn't allow an MTU 1460 on L2TP, while 12.0.7(T) works
fine with a 1492 MTU that my PPPoE customers expect. Every rev I've tried
from 12.0 and up has problems with CEF when using ISL VLAN sub-interfaces,
17 matches
Mail list logo
