RE: Waiver of IP and AS Number Transfer Fees

The intension is to get the information correct. If company X took over another company who owned a couple /whatevers, or if a company merely changed their name and wanted their ASN to represent that, it would cost $250 to change. Many companies, who aren't in the "we sell IPs business", don't ca

RE: Waiver of IP and AS Number Transfer Fees

>Please correct me if I am wrong. This is not allowing the practice of >selling IPs or ASes, I've never really come around to fully understand the notion (more and more common, it seems) of _selling_ such..? (Maybe I'm an idealist :) > but it encourages those of us who have acquired other >comp

RE: Waiver of IP and AS Number Transfer Fees

> TWiMC: > > No doubt most with the responsibility of doing so received this > statement, but > > OWN 'M IF YOU GOT 'M--clean up the databases > > (Unfortunately for me I just paid a $250 on June 27th--lucky me.) > > j > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR

Re: AS path fugliness?

This has disappeared from here... Marshall Eubanks wrote: > > I see the same from AS 16517 - > > *> 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701 > 3561 23037 {80,109,122,... > > Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037 > Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the sourc

FW: Waiver of IP and AS Number Transfer Fees

TWiMC: No doubt most with the responsibility of doing so received this statement, but OWN 'M IF YOU GOT 'M--clean up the databases (Unfortunately for me I just paid a $250 on June 27th--lucky me.) j -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

Re: European packet loss average increasing

> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Sabri Berisha wrote: > > > > AMS-IX graphs seem to have a glitch, or one heck of a DDOS. > > > http://www.ams-ix.net/hugegraph.html > > > > This was a power outage. > > I doubt the dip in the graph, which looks to me like about 1G missing > between 12:00-19:00 was just f

Re: AS path fugliness?

ML> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:40:58 -0600 ML> From: Mike Lewinski ML> *> 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701 3561 ML> 23037 {80,109,122,... ML> We've opened a ticket with C&W. The tech I spoke with wasn't ML> aware of this issue. It does appear

Re: AS path fugliness?

"Marshall Eubanks" wrote: > I see the same from AS 16517 - > > *> 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701 > 3561 23037 {80,109,122,... > > Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037 > Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem. We've opened a ticke

Re: AS path fugliness?

ML> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:12:42 -0600 ML> From: Mike Lewinski ML> Of course it would be towards the end of the table. ML> ML> Here's a sample of the more detailed log at http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html ML> ML> *>i205.139.72.0 a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037 ML> {1239,178

Re: AS path fugliness?

I see the same from AS 16517 - *> 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701 3561 23037 {80,109,122,... Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037 Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem. Regards Marshall Eubanks Mike Lewinski wrote: > Of cour

Re: AS path fugliness?

We've had 4 crashes with chunk corruption On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:46, Mike Lewinski wrote: > > Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these: > > Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for > aspath, requested size 268 > Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT:

Re: AS path fugliness?

Of course it would be towards the end of the table. Here's a sample of the more detailed log at http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html *>i205.139.72.0 a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037 {1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453, 6580,6993,7132,7795,102

Re: AS path fugliness?

>> Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these: Yes, but I saw it only once from four different sources: Through AS1: Jul 3 07:23:56: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 266 Through AS6461: Jul 3 07:22:51: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insuff

AS path fugliness?

Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these: Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270 Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHU

Re: European packet loss average increasing

On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Sabri Berisha wrote: > > AMS-IX graphs seem to have a glitch, or one heck of a DDOS. > > http://www.ams-ix.net/hugegraph.html > > This was a power outage. I doubt the dip in the graph, which looks to me like about 1G missing between 12:00-19:00 was just from that 3 second p

Re: European packet loss average increasing

> For those who don't know, Ebone had a policy of zero packet loss on the > network 99.5% of the time and we managed to exceed this on almost all of > our links. You mean like every other service provider? :-)

Re: European packet loss average increasing

>My non-scientific measurements (i.e. pings to well known european >sites) show an increase in packet loss to about 6%, the 10 day >average previously was less than 1%. That is similar to what the Internet Traffic Report for Europe shows at this URL http://www.internettrafficreport.com/cgi-bin

Re: European packet loss average increasing

## On 2002-07-02 09:12 -0400 German Martinez typed: GM> GM> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:12:47 -0400 (EDT) GM> From: German Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GM> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GM> Subject: Ebone Shutdown GM> GM> GM> http://www.nocpeople.org/ebone/broadcast2.html GM> GM> GM> Broadcast Message K