Reverse-DNS changes for
61/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8,
2001:0200::/23 and 2001:0C00::/23
APNIC has converted its DNS generation processes to a new system.
This is in preparation for conversion to RPSL based whois services,
as APNIC generates authoritative
Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:04:05PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
--The service provider must not determine the recipients of the material.
One could argue (in theory) that a routing-table lookup
may satisfy this.
I'm not so sure. Generally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jeff Ogden wrote:
The thing that I find most disturbing with this latest approach to
enforcement by the RIAA is that they have targeted backbone providers
who probably don't have any business or other relationship with the
The industry needs one or more clueful persons willing to act as expert
witnesses in these types of court cases. Because of Dave Farber's role in
the early Internet, the legal community views him as an authority on the
subject. At this point I think there are a lot of people whose knowledge
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 11:46, Owen DeLong wrote:
*snip*
Please, the intent of that sentence is to say that the ISP cannot set
the
destination IP address for the content. The intervening backbones don't
do
that, they merely copy it to the next hop as the MAC addresses are
modified
to send
Hey everyone, I know this is slightly off topic but I'm hoping that someone
from Verisign or the like will respond. I am looking for a VERY secure
computer cabinet to replace an open rack I have now. I'm looking for almost
vault like qualities. Is anyone willing to make recommendations on
Andrew Dorsett [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hey everyone, I know this is slightly off topic but I'm hoping that someone
from Verisign or the like will respond. I am looking for a VERY secure
computer cabinet to replace an open rack I have now. I'm looking for
almost
vault like
A question :
Doesn't Internap use BGP as part of its load balancing ? Don't they
sell / market this service ? Isn't each Internap node connected to 4
providers ?
SO, wouldn't canceling China Telecom BGP through ATT CW and UUnet do
nothing except cause some BGP advertisement changes at
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jeff Ogden wrote:
The thing that I find most disturbing with this latest approach to
enforcement by the RIAA is that they have targeted backbone providers
who probably don't have any business or other relationship with
http://www.mtpartners.com/home.htm
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin J. Carrasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re: Secure Cabinets
Andrew,
I am looking for a
Or maybe, the four providers named are the same 4 being used by Internap at
that node, so effectively terminating the announcement from all 4 directions
to Internap solves the problem.
There is a historical precedent that supports this theory.
For those who can set their Way-Back Machines
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:59:03 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The industry needs one or more clueful persons willing to act as expert
witnesses in these types of court cases. Because of Dave Farber's role in
the early Internet, the legal community views him as an authority on the
subject. At
I actually didn't see anything but its probably my own bad search:) I'll
try again.
Thanks
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the slightly off topic question but very briefly.
What tools are people using for 95th percentile billing. Anything unix
based
Marshall Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SO, wouldn't canceling China Telecom BGP through ATT CW and UUnet do
nothing except cause some BGP advertisement changes at Internap ?
I'm not even sure if shutting listen4ever down is on the RIAA agenda.
Wouldn't the easiest course of action be to
I have a home grown program that gives 95th percentile from mrtg data
files... and can display it on the mrtg page as an odometer (using fly) or
text for a monthly report. Because of mrtg data reduction, it isn't exact
(weighted on the most recent three days), but it does its best to
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Tim Thorne wrote:
I'm not even sure if shutting listen4ever down is on the RIAA agenda.
Wouldn't the easiest course of action be to file suit against Verisign
and have their DNS nuked?
that would be the logical approach. or they could get an order against
the usg and
Hello Andrew,
Monday, August 19, 2002, 12:11:02 PM, you wrote:
AD Hey everyone, I know this is slightly off topic but I'm hoping that someone
AD from Verisign or the like will respond. I am looking for a VERY secure
AD computer cabinet to replace an open rack I have now. I'm looking for
It's a list... But it includes the asn-name and registering nic-handle.
ftp://ftp.arin.net/netinfo/asn.txt
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Segal
Director, Data Services
Futureway Communications Inc.
Tel: (905)326-1570
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Doncaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Benjamin J. Carrasco wrote:
place. In my opinion, the RIAA is not unlike a predator that has
acquired an insatiable appetite; it needs to be placed on a very short
leash. The RIAA is one of the few organizations that have etched out a
policy that is overtly alienating
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
I've always used whois.arin.net to check ASN registrations, and until now
it's always had information on those that I've checked.
It doesn't have anything for 1221, which according to
route-views.oregon-ix.net is Telstra. Is there a single
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
Andy Dills
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Ralph Doncaster
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ASN registry?
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
I've always used
maybe you're forgetting Australia... think APNIC...
-Original Message-
From: Derek Samford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:51 PM
To: 'Andy Dills'; 'Ralph Doncaster'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ASN registry?
-Original Message-
[...]
the lower range controlled by ARIN. No idea why ARIN doesn't have a
record
for it...they only carry records for ASN 16779, which is Telstra-USA.
Andy
I noticed that as well. But a quick google shows that Telstra is most
definitely AS1221. Maybe they forgot to renew one of
That's a little odd, considering that's included in a range of AS' that
RIPE shows as delegated to ARIN. Anyone have any ideas?
Derek
-Original Message-
From: Kris Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:56 PM
To: 'Derek Samford'; 'Andy Dills'; 'Ralph
That's a little odd, considering that's included in a range of AS' that
RIPE shows as delegated to ARIN. Anyone have any ideas?
aut-num AS1221, inverse
[...]
remarks AS assigned by the former InterNIC
[...]
source APNIC
mh
Derek
-Original
On 08:43 AM 8/19/02, Jeff Ogden wrote:
I am also concerned that the backbone providers might not put up a
rigorous fight against the RIAA since they would mostly be defending
the rights of people and organizations that they don't do business
with directly. I can imagine that Worldcom may
aut-num AS1221, inverse
as-name ASN-TELSTRA
descrTelstra Pty Ltd
descrLocked Bag No. 5744
descrGPO, Canberra, ACT, 2601
country AU
admin-c GH105-AP, inverse
tech-c
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, JC Dill wrote:
rigorous fight against the RIAA since they would mostly be defending
the rights of people and organizations that they don't do business
If one voluntarily caves in, they will almost certainly see their sales
plummet. Would you buy bandwidth from a
That seems to be the closest to a complete db, but I noticed it doesn't
necessarily have the same info as ARIN. For example ARIN's listing for
1239 has a lot more details than the RADB entry.
From the responses so far, it seems that it is necessary in some cases to
query ARIN, RIPE, and APNIC
Anyone have recommendations for LAN analysers?
(besides building a box and using tcpdump)
Personal experiences, recommendations, etc...?
Private reply works.
Thanks
--
--
http://www.zeromemory.com - metal for your ears.
Ethereal - free, and decent.
Shomiti Surveyor - expensive, requires special hardware for line rate (and
excess) traffic generation, and difficult as could be to use. But very
powerful.
Basically, it depends on what you want to do with it. If you want to
analyze what's going on on the LAN, I
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
Ok, extremely dumb question. But I'm sure lots of other people have
already solved this one.
Network operators have been using various PGPs to exchange confidential
information for many years. I have my own personal PGP key for my own
use and a
At 04:10 PM 8/19/2002 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
Interesting. So then, how did that happen?
as-block:AS1 - AS1876
descr: ARIN ASN block
remarks: These AS numbers are further assigned by ARIN
remarks: to ARIN members and end-users in the ARIN region
admin-c: ARIN1-RIPE
S! Don't tell folks that there were delegation registries that
predated RIPE, APNIC, ARIN (created in that order).
--bill
Ralph,
ARIN only handles the ASNs for North and South America, and the southern
half of Africa. And has the records for most of the historical stuff from
when before APNIC and RIPE NCC existed.
Simple rule, if it isn't at ARIN, check APNIC and RIPE NCC databases.
Telstra is in Australia,
There was a GSA approved container [i.e. safe to you laymen]
that was built to hold Milnet routers, yet have ventilation and
cable access.
Uou might find it a little rich and a little heavy for your
needs...
--
A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no one will talk to a host
Has anyone else had the unpleasant experience of
dealing with Broadview?? I'd love to hear some horror
stories
At 10:45 AM 20-08-02 +1000, Philip Smith wrote:
ARIN is in the midst of a process to move the pre-existing ASNs to RIPE and
APNIC. See: http://www.arin.net/registration/erx/index.html
Interesting is that AS1221 is not listed on that page.
-Hank
Ralph,
ARIN only handles the ASNs for
38 matches
Mail list logo
