VA> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:59:08 -0800 (PST)
VA> From: Vadim Antonov
VA> Well, blocking TCP SYNs is not a way to block establishment
VA> of sessions between _cooperating_ hosts.
With cooperating hosts, anything goes. Hack up the IP stack, and
have specially-crafted DNS queries carry the ISN
Someone might read this as inflation of customer base numbers... has this
company been involved in scandals recently ? :-)
Rubens
- Original Message -
From: "Vadim Antonov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott Granados" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 20,
I've heard more of a payment / pgne issue but again not sure.
Also other carriers in that buildeing including level3 I believe and no
issues from them.
Also no power issues mentioned on kron, kgo, kntv or ktvu either nor
ksfo's radio so uh um yeah.
Oh and while writing this, a call to pgne yiel
Over a day of downtime due to a short? Whose side is the short on -
PG&E's or Navisite's? There's no excuse for a delay this long, on either
end.
Of course, all info regarding this outage has been second-hand, so I'll
reserve judgment.
I'd have expected some level of local news coverage if PG&
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Avleen Vig wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
> > > I was refering specifically to end user workstations. For example home
> > > machines on dial up or broadband connections.
> > > A lot of broadband providers already prohibit running servers an
I know this isn't an equipment list, but exhaustive searches have afforded
no useable results.
I'm in need of the above-mentioned rectifier. If anyone has such in
stock, kindly send a quote off-list.
Thanks in advance,
Brian
Don't think you can find products *without* NEBS/DC for products of this type, but
have a look at:
http://www.oasystel.com/
Regards,
Andrew
taqua.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Mathew Lodge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 7:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > Indeed it does break that. P2P clients: Mostly transfer illegal content.
> > As much as a lot of people love using these, I'm sure most realise they're
> > on borrowed time in their current state.
> > And I'm sure that if they were gone tomorr
And their are legal uses for p2p. I have a customer who works with some of
these technologies for legal and approved file transfers like game
publishing.
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Avleen Vig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Christopher L. Morrow
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Avleen Vig wrote:
> > Doesn't this stop kazaa/morpheus/gnutella/FTP/ > chats>? This is a problematic setup, and woudl require the cable modem
> > provider to maintain a quickly changing 'firewall' :( I understand the
> > want to do it, but I'm not sure its practical to see it
I'm looking for recommendations for a small, cheap SONET ADM for our labs.
It doesn't have to be fancy, just basic ADM and TDM mux functionality -- we
don't care about NEBS, redundancy, remote management, cabling simplicity,
power etc.
Our ideal system would take in a channelized OC3/STM-1 and
I have a suggestion for UUNET's backbone engineering folks:
Please, create a fake customer ID and publish it, so outside folks could
file trouble reports regarding routing issues within UUNET.
--vadim
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Scott Granados wrote:
>
> What's interesting is that I just tried to
They are also in the public domain, from the last set of emails I saw on
the topic.
:-)
Russ
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Mark Segal wrote:
>
> Try.. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/503/2.html They are "cisco" icons..
> But they are mostly the generic kinds as described by David in a follow up
> e
> > > > Block all TCP 21 and 80 ?
> > > Why not just block all incoming SYN ?
> > Doesn't this stop kazaa/morpheus/gnutella/FTP/?
> Indeed it does break that. P2P clients: Mostly transfer illegal content. [...]
> Ftp/HTTP etc I believe most cable providers currently block these anyway :-)
> There
Stoned koalas drooled eucalyptus spit in awe as Avleen Vig exclaimed:
Doesn't this stop kazaa/morpheus/gnutella/FTP/? This is a problematic setup, and woudl require the cable
modem provider to maintain a quickly changing 'firewall' :( I understand
the want to do it, but I'm not sure its practic
>From what Internap has told me, power went out at Navisite (I'm getting
tired of name changes) at 10:15 on 1/19 due to PG&E de-energizing the grid
that feeds the DC due to a short. No ETA on when the grid will be back.
John
Scott Granados said:
>
> Anyone know what's up with Clearblue in SF, 6
So did you aquire those "assets" from clearblue or where the appliedtheory's
assets kindof devided between fastnet and clearblue? And if undertand it
correctly apliedtheory name & domain are still with clearblue/navisite?
If so is it the same for CRL?
I'm primarily just curious in terms of find
I am interested in hearing how/if TTM (Test Traffic Measurements) is
currently being used in North American networks. Practical experiences,
gotcha's, value proposition, support, etc.. would be of interest.
Also, are there any alternative projects that are also worth
consideration?
Thanks,
Jos
I particularly enjoyed my time in (Northern) Europe due to the
cleanliness of the streets and parking lots. No pools of dripped fluids
in every space. Made motorcycle riding much more enjoyable. Rather
strict inspection requirements then. If your car had visible drips when
inspected underneath or
Anyone know what's up with Clearblue in SF, 650 Townsend St.
I've been getting alerts that they have been with out power now for a couple
days and are still on generator power.
Thanks
Scott
Try.. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/503/2.html They are "cisco" icons..
But they are mostly the generic kinds as described by David in a follow up
email.
Mark
--
Mark Segal
Director, Data Services
Futureway Communications Inc.
Tel: (905)326-1570
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do any of the standards organizations (ISO?) have a set of icons/symbols to
represent network devices ranging from routers to servers to load balancers?
I've always used the basic Cisco and Juniper icons, but I'm being directed
to find something not associated with a ven
Can anyone here recommend an individual or company who would analyze a
working network design from head to toe, suggesting changes and improvements
where needed. This would include overall design from a high level but also
analyze actual router/switch config's. Looking for someone/somecompany wh
Well there are the symbols included with Visio however I'm not sure that is
much more than the boxes you mentioned.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:00 AM
Subject: standard network symbols/icons
>
> Hello,
>
> Do any
Hello,
Do any of the standards organizations (ISO?) have a set of icons/symbols to
represent network devices ranging from routers to servers to load balancers?
I've always used the basic Cisco and Juniper icons, but I'm being directed
to find something not associated with a vendor in *any* way, b
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > I was refering specifically to end user workstations. For example home
> > machines on dial up or broadband connections.
> > A lot of broadband providers already prohibit running servers and block
> > certain inbound ports (eg 21 and 80).
> >
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Avleen Vig wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
> > > you could partly get around this by blocking all 'SYN' packets going to
> > > your customers :-)
> >
> > and we are hoping none are hosting webservers or mail servers or
> > right? Oh wait! I'
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> At 02:26 PM 19-01-03 -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
>
> I don't believe Chris sleeps, ever.
I do, and I ski :) (and play hockey)... except for hockey I have a cell
phone near me... and mostly the other 4 people are available too :)
>
> -Hank
>
>
>
The capabilities of hash-based tracebacks has come up a few times in the
past couple of days. Most of the discussion has been quite accurate (always
nice to see one's work understood!) but there are two points that I thought
might benefit from clarification:
> The SPIE hash-based
> traceback i
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Scott Granados wrote:
>
> network either. Same response with the exception of "Well we don't have
> security persons available after hours so write us an e-mail and you may get
> a response within 48 hours". Which to me sounded just plain wrong because
> I've seen threds
I can verify that.
David Barak
--Fully RFC 1925 Compliant--
--- Hank Nussbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 02:26 PM 19-01-03 -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
>
> I don't believe Chris sleeps, ever.
>
> -Hank
>
>
> >Its just unfortunate that some companies not
> mentioning names feel th
at Monday, January 20, 2003 5:25 AM, Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
seen to say:
>> What incentive does the end-user have to use secure systems? Should
>> Microsoft, Sun, Sendmail Inc or ISC be required to send a technician
>> out to fix every defective system they released? Why should the
32 matches
Mail list logo
