On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:50:01PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly
as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more
experience and skills to back it up. I think the results are
Altho sometime I have to wonder
More OpenSSL (and SSH) fun.
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-March/004524.html
AND
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-March/004529.html
In a message written on Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:31:08AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
When you get a /8, you expect it to be fully usable. The
APNIC posture here seems to make sense to me that its an issue
that needs to be resolved. using one of the other currently
reserved /8's while that
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Just like the people who get 69/8 blocks should expect them to be
fully usable as well, right? Surely if one reserved /24 means you
can return space and get new space assigned then the inability to
reach some percentage of the internet is an even
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Just like the people who get 69/8 blocks should expect them to be
fully usable as well, right?
I think all that really needs to happen here is an RFC update that
unreserves 223.255.255.0/24. RFC3330 already mentioned that the basis for
this
In a message written on Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 07:01:32AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simply having someonechange a DB entry or create an RFC will
not affect the installed silicon base. Won't work.
APNIC is on the moral highground here. They received damaged
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:39:31AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
More OpenSSL (and SSH) fun.
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-March/004524.html
AND
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-March/004529.html
Fun is about all it comes to. See what
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Francis writes:
Fun is about all it comes to. See what Schneier had to say in the most
recent crypto-gram regarding this hole.
http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0303.html
This is a new attack, not the one Schneier was talking about. It's
very elegant
-Original Message-
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to strongly encourage IANA to reexamine all current IANA-Reserved
blocks, decide which ones will remain Reserved for the forseeable future,
and which are likely candidates for assignment to RIRs at any future
Greetings.
Is there anyone out there in the NANOG community who uses the Nortel SHASTA
box for aggregation that would like to technically chat offline?
Regards,
Gerard White
Aliant
Is there anyone out there in the NANOG community who uses the Nortel SHASTA
box for aggregation that would like to technically chat offline?
Didn´t nortel more or less kill or suffocate the product quite quickly after
the aquiring the company? (as they did Promatory)
Pete
Steve Bellovin wrote:
The only caveat is that their attack currently works on LANs, not WANs,
because they need more precise timing than is generally feasible over the Internet.
On the other hand, many of the SSL servers on the web
are located in hosting centers, which are LAN-connected to
I use this product. I think they still sell this product especially in dsl
enviroments. Good for the pptp and ppoe stuff.
Alan
You can contact me directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Petri Helenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:01 AM
To:
How can you control outbound traffic from a single subnet - meaning forcing
all its outbound traffic out a single bgp edge router in a multihomed
environment.
Here is the scenario:
1. Inbound traffic is engineered using prepends - meaning to force inbound
traffic through a particular router,
Routing based on source address is called Policy Routing. IF you are on a cisco
box, create an extended access-list specifying the source Ip's, and then match that
access list in a route map to set the next hop. Apply the route map on ports facing
that customer, building a chain from edge
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:55:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Francis writes:
Fun is about all it comes to. See what Schneier had to say in the most
recent crypto-gram regarding this hole.
http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0303.html
This is
sent to e2e hoping thread pursued on only
one mailing list but wasn't sure which
one would hate it more. fwiw.
critical feedback/corrections/thoughts welcome
k
- Forwarded message from k claffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:26:30 -0800
From: k claffy [EMAIL
17 matches
Mail list logo
