NANOG:
This message was posted originally on the isp-bgp list, and I was told that
it should have been posted on one of the network operator lists or a Cisco
list if I really wanted advice on Cisco equipment from veteran network
operators who have used this equipment extensively in the past for
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
> It would be easier to troubleshoot if you used a browser that returned
> a meaningful error message. "The page could not be found" could be just
> about anything. DNS, routing, broken link, etc.
> ---
> vickyr> i even tried the same thing und
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 19:04:25 PDT, Etaoin Shrdlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I include every single default install of every single OS that enables
> anything more than port 22),
Speaking of which, a heads-up... Jay Dyson was reporting on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list that he's seeing an ups
Have you tried using DNS servers other than the ones supplied by your
ISPs DHCP server?
Todd
--
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
| Vicky Rode
| Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 9:57 PM
| To: David A. Ulevitch; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subjec
Even if 3mil machines are actively and currently compromised,
of all reachable hosts on the Internet, it would not be unreasonable
to assume that %80 or more are vulnerable to remote compromise
in some way. That number is speculative, but most estimates from
consutling firms are much higher. (
Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> http://www.vnunet.com/News/1141901
>
> Trustcorps claims it has scientific and anecdotal resaerch supporting its
> conclusion that over three million computers are "owned" by malicious
> groups.
Well, it isn't as if that article really had many of the details that were
m
Hi David,
i'm just couple feet away from my box. i'm currently using wireless and even
tried wired with same results. the fact others are experiencing similar
problems makes me believe the problem could be on time warner end, possible
caching issue.
regards,
/vicky
-Original Message
It would be interesting to know if the FBI or any other group can
characterize how many computers are 0wn3d per minute. Then, of those
computers, how many remain 0wn3d indefinitely?
Marc
>
Trustcorps claims it has scientific and anecdotal resaerch supporting
its conclusion that over three milli
Sounds like you might need to increase the local preference on the new registrar.
OK, back to being serious, they don't announce to the root server. The registered
nameservers (belonging to the registrar in your case, but in many other cases
belonging to an ISP/NSP/WHP) answer queries made by
> vickyr> i'm a time warner end-user trying to access outside world
> which could be anything.
[SNIP]
> vickyr> yes i have and they think it could be the cable modem box
> and have issued a replacement. i sure hope they have a good stock
> because i know whole bunch of people who are having s
Hi Jay,
see comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 4:09 PM
To: Vicky Rode
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: has anyone notice this ?
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
> just wondering has anyone noticed h
Hey, Sean.
] Trustcorps claims it has scientific and anecdotal resaerch supporting its
] conclusion that over three million computers are "owned" by malicious
] groups.
Interesting.
] On the other hand, Information Risk Management questioned how any one
] person could "own" hundreds of computer
http://www.vnunet.com/News/1141901
Trustcorps claims it has scientific and anecdotal resaerch supporting its
conclusion that over three million computers are "owned" by malicious
groups.
On the other hand, Information Risk Management questioned how any one
person could "own" hundreds of compute
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
> just wondering has anyone noticed http access issue ("the page cannot be
> displayed") on time warner network ? i literally have to try 5 to 6 times to
> get to the page. i believe this problem just started a week or so back.
It would be easier to trouble
Thanks, John. I appreciate it. As participants at AADS, StarLight, and
StarTAP, I feel that this will be a significant enhancement to
communication among th participants.
Now, if we can just convince the AADS management to use the list...
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Net
howdy folks,
just wondering has anyone noticed http access issue ("the page cannot be
displayed") on time warner network ? i literally have to try 5 to 6 times to
get to the page. i believe this problem just started a week or so back.
i've even talked to few other people on socal.rr.com network
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> OK, I seem to have missed identifying a finer point.
You need to reread/do that google, you're mistaken in your understanding on what
is happening..
> Both registrars (old and new) also host the DNS records for the domain
> (actually several domains)
On Saturday 28 June 2003, at 12:08, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Questions:
1) How does one registrar 'win out' over a second registrar when
updating root servers?
It's important not to confuse registry services (in which a central
registry of names and metadata is maintained by various authorised
OK, I seem to have missed identifying a finer point.
Both registrars (old and new) also host the DNS records for the domain
(actually several domains). My question is which registrar (both are fully
configured) will ultimately win at the root server, and how is this
determined?
The mail and web
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
>
> > > 2) How can I verify that the domain will be properly 'announced'
> > >to the root servers by the new registrar?
> >
> > whois
>
> Well, kinda sorta. By far, most of the time whois is correct.
>
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> > 2) How can I verify that the domain will be properly 'announced'
> >to the root servers by the new registrar?
>
> whois
Well, kinda sorta. By far, most of the time whois is correct.
However, this is gauranteed to tell you the actual situatio
You may wish to read up on domain names and DNS, you can probably google
something up or heres the RFCs
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1034.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt
Your questions are off the mark somewhat, you must whois the domain to check you
have the correct DNS servers the que
I have a question about the way DNS records are announced/handled. Thank
you in advance for any insight into this, and I hope this isn't too far off
topic for discussion here.
Background:
- I have a domain whose MX and DNS is handled by registrar ABC
and I am moving that domain to registra
--On 06/01/2003 11:57:21 PM -0400 Sean Donelan wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Every major time service and most national standards labs maintain a
set of clocks of comparable accuracy - US, UK, France, Germany, Russia,
Japan, Australia, etc., so there is no shortage of timing i
Hello,
AS29766 is originating 67.105.199.0/24 to Bell South without
authorization.
I have tried getting this resolved with Jason and Chuma at 800-317-3343,
but they refuse to block this without authorization from the customer.
I have leaked the /24 as well, but this needs to be addressed ASAP.
Subject: Re: National Do Not Call Registry has opened Date: Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at
08:14:51PM +0100 Quoting Roland Perry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nick Nelson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> >I was thinking more along the line of a bot submitting every possible
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
