hi there,
although i don't have a spare time for this, maybe there is anyone of
the spam fighters willing to perform an analysis of what amount of spam
is [probably] sent to addressess digested from various lists like nanog
or cisco-nsp? from my own experience, the number of spams i receive
Kelly Cooper asked me to forward this to NANOG.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:05:38 + (GMT)
From: Kelly J. Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: goodbye good luck
My last day with BBN/BBN Planet/GTE Internetworking/Genuity/Level3 is
Managing security perception can sometimes reduce security risks or the
security TCO, by reducing the number of low-risk attackers. Die-hards will
only stop for real security controls, but you may find easier to impose such
controls without a lot of noise from your security alarms.
The real
On 10.07 19:56, Randy Bush wrote:
note the 37. address. cute, eh? and i thought omphaloskepsis
was greek!
Someone is going to have fun when tat part of 37/8 gets assigned and used.
as the us military is blocking overseas access to more and more address
space, i guess non-american
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 11 21:46:47 2003 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table
